Bernard Hopkins Is Not A Bully...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • comanick
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 349
    • 44
    • 0
    • 7,526

    #21
    Originally posted by TRUTH
    Hopkins is not a guy that relies on power so how is he a bully for beating up on Tito and DLH? Hopkins is all skill...Thats why the DLH was actually doing good at first because Hopkins is not some bully who is way stronger and can just over power DLH. Oscar was able to match him skill wise. Nard out powered him in the end but if that body shot didn't happen it could have went to a decision. What I'm saying is Hopkins is a boxer not a slugger so how is he a bully for beating smaller opponents? Its not like he does it in a bully fashion really, he uses boxing smarts. I think he would have done the same thing to Tito if he was 2-3 inches shorter.

    does anyone know what I'm saying?
    I agree with 100%. i just do see how no one else sees that. Its kinda like they dont watch the fights they just read the names. Hop didnt beat tito with size or even dirty tactics. He just straight up outclassed him. I dont even remember many clinches in that fight. Another thing i dont get is why people seem to think hop is some huge guy. Hes not. Hes skinny. Hes tall but skinny like a hearns.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP