Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hopkins: "I Destroy Careers, Calzaghe is Next!"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by kayjay View Post
    How long have you been reading this forum? Hopkins IS NOT FROM "THE STREET." He's from a soft, middle-class neighborhood.
    Every bio on Hopkins says hes from the street thats ever been told. Now one person on boxingscene.com named KayJay changes history? I just find it hard to believe.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by TRUTH View Post
      He just said "it ain't a shame to lose to a white man." The only reason he said that was to get people talking, and it worked.
      Bull****.

      It's nice to try to save him by pretending he had a plan. He had no plan. He was not in control of his faculties when he made that statement. And he's been backtracking and trying desperately to explain himself ever since.

      He got heated b/c Joe showed him disdain, and he lost it. The real Bernard came out suddenly, and it turns out he's as ugly inside as he is outside.


      I wonder about anyone who actually wants him to win.



      Calzaghe winning is obviously the better result for everyone

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by TRUTH View Post
        Every bio on Hopkins says hes from the street thats ever been told. Now one person on boxingscene.com named KayJay changes history? I just find it hard to believe.
        Everyone from Philly who knows his neighborhood finds his image laughable. It's publicity.

        But it makes no difference to me if you believe me

        Comment


        • #24
          I simply can't understand how fight fans can really believe that Hopkins has anything but a long shot chance in winning this fight. I can't blame Hopkins for taking the fight since it's a really good payday , nor am I surprised of all the jaw ******* he does leading up to the fight. Hopkins is not in his prime anymore boxing skills wise but his mouth is far from being old. Hopkins is the one who has shown his diminished skills in the last few years, he's a great fighter but can only fight in spurts. Hopkins is never been known as a devastating puncher and now he's fighting bigger guys that only diminishes his punching power. Calzaghe like him or hate him has not shown that his stamina has diminshed like Hopkins and has consistantly shown he can not only overwhelm much younger opponents but has the skills to stay to stay in the pocket with much harder punchers than Hopkins ever was and be successful. Calzaghe's only worry in this fight is Hopkins uncanny ability to get dirty when he's just out of sight of the referee so a cut from a butt or elbow or low blows should be watched for as Hopkins only chance is to cut or injure Calzaghe early enough to slow him down enough to make their work rate equal. I frankly don't see this happening and still expect a huge wide margin win for Calzaghe with Hopkins complaining he was robbed just like in the two losses to Jermain Taylor although I thought he won the rematch.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by bluemax View Post
            I simply can't understand how fight fans can really believe that Hopkins has anything but a long shot chance in winning this fight. .
            It's similar to Mayweather-Hatton in this regard. A lot of people picked Hatton to win, though it doesn't make sense that they actually thought it would happen. This fight is about as mismatched, no?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by _Ricky_ View Post
              Can he do one interview without mentioning being "street" ?

              The ****'s pathetic.
              That's like Calzaghe doing an interview without mentioning Lacy, and I am a Calzaghe fan.

              Comment


              • #27
                ^^I'm not going to argue with you. Everything that is being discussed here is subjective.

                subjective-

                1. existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought (opposed to objective).
                2. pertaining to or characteristic of an individual; personal; individual: a subjective evaluation.
                3. placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric.

                -dictionary.com

                Comment


                • #28
                  Doesn't look like he destroyed Tarvers career.

                  Trinidad was on the crest of a wave, an out of his depth. Oscar's career has hardly been destroyed BHOP's works for him, and he fights whenever and whoever he pleases.

                  Winky has been quiet, but Hopkins ecked a decision, hardly destroyed a career. Winky is just overrating his drawing power.
                  Last edited by sparked_85; 04-14-2008, 08:38 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Old B-Hop's going to have to do a lot of talking afterwards to try and riddle out of this mess he is in!
                    Worth watching just to see an Executioner, Executeted!

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
                      Hopkins does destroy careers. He completely destroyed the career f Jermaine Taylor and Roy Jones, oh and De La Hoya was never a draw after his loss to Hopkins, and Tarver will never fight again.
                      yea dont forget titos

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP