Hopkins Set To Retire After Calzaghe

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chase8400
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2007
    • 2861
    • 95
    • 63
    • 3,022

    #61
    WTF are u saying?

    Originally posted by Carlisle
    Hopkins has fought the best for the last 10 years. When Roy Jones was in his prime knocking everybody out with ease.. Hopkins was the man who took him the distance making Roy say, "Hopkins is a MAN". James Toney, Bernard Hopkins, Michael Nunn, Hopkins, Virgil Hill represented an era of Boxing Legends. Understand that the air in Wales which Calzaghe flourished in was never as thick . Hopkins is old.. not as old as Foreman was when he knocked out Michael Moore but old enough for Calzaghe to be able to get in the same ring with him. If he was younger Calzaghe would get KTFO but since Hopkins is older he will only get beat up. Hopkins is one of the best of the best. Thats what a legend is. Hopkins is a living legend and come fight night he will punish and make Calzaghe look amateurish like he did Tarver who is good but flawed like Calzaghe.
    Flawed like Calzaghe? Get real. What in Calzaghe's 44-0 record indicates a flaw. Hopkins fought the best for 10 years? Go to Boxrec.com and see if he did that. Nope. Is Simon Brown the best? How about Robert Allen (3) times , Antwun Echols, Keith Holmes, Carl Daniels, Morrade Hakkar, William Joppy or Howard Eastman? Are they the best? Hell to the no. The only real good fighters that he beat during that time was Tito and Oscar who were welterweights at the time he fought them. Tarver was a good win, but that is way later. So, I fail to understand your post.

    Comment

    • moofo
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2007
      • 3062
      • 294
      • 232
      • 3,796

      #62
      Originally posted by Gatti9783
      Maybe because you have a British flag in your AVI you douche bag. Go jerk off to some Calzaghe posters ****. Your boxing opinions are as worthless as your father's *****.
      Wrong again ****wit.
      My avatar does NOT have a British flag.
      It doesn't have any flag in it that is recognised anywhere in the world.
      The meaning of it will forever fly by your Hollow Skull.
      Try again arsehole and lets see if you can get something right for once.
      Unfortunately it seems you will come up short just like the Doctor that was supposed to abort your malformed withered puss ridden Body from your mothers cavenous scab riddled womb.

      Comment

      • ИATAS
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2007
        • 36648
        • 2,509
        • 1,953
        • 50,835

        #63
        Originally posted by moofo
        Winky Oscar & Tito all made their fame below 160.
        Glen Johnson WAS NOT at his best when he met Hopkins.
        Tarver was not at his best which was never better than mediocre.
        Tito was in his prime and a 4-1 favorite. He was undefeated and did perfectly fine his fights prior to Hopkins at middleweight.

        ODH did struggle in one of his fights prior, so you can have that one, but still bhop is the only man to ever KO him. Winky who cares about that fight, he chose to fight bhop and lost. The smaller fighter factor we went over before. Should Marvin Hagler be discredited for his fights with Hearns, Duran and Leonard? Nope, they chose to fight him even though they made their names under middle (and if the smaller guy by only a few pounds is the better fighter, there is no reason he shouldn't be able to (as proven with Leonard/Hagler, Mayweather/ODH, etc., etc., etc.)).

        Tarver was also a favorite and the only reason why people say he is no longer in his prime is because he got his ass kicked by Hopkins!

        And when exactly was Glen Johnson in his prime then? He was 32-0 when Hopkins TKO'd him in the 11th. After that he never had a stretch of winning more than 4 fights in a row.

        Hopkins has one of the best resumes out of any active fighter and has one of the greatest careers out of any active fighter. You can name only a few that have accomplished more or have more impressive resumes. It's clear that anything hopkins has done, you have some sort of excuse or counter for.

        Why you continue to hate on Hopkins is beyond me (and you've been doing so for a very long time).

        We understand you don't like him, that's cool. But to deny the man of any credit is simply being extremely biased and you're obviously not willing to admit the man has accomplished a ton (again, much more then most active fighters by far) in the sport.
        Last edited by ИATAS; 04-04-2008, 05:30 PM.

        Comment

        • edgarg
          Honest BoxingScene posts
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 11045
          • 547
          • 54
          • 39,228

          #64
          Originally posted by natas206
          Tito was in his prime and a 4-1 favorite. He was undefeated and did perfectly fine his fights prior to Hopkins at middleweight.

          ODH did struggle in one of his fights prior, so you can have that one, but still bhop is the only man to ever KO him. Winky who cares about that fight, he chose to fight bhop and lost. The smaller fighter factor we went over before. Should Marvin Hagler be discredited for his fights with Hearns, Duran and Leonard? Nope, they chose to fight him even though they made their names under middle (and if the smaller guy by only a few pounds is the better fighter, there is no reason he shouldn't be able to (as proven with Leonard/Hagler, Mayweather/ODH, etc., etc., etc.)).

          Tarver was also a favorite and the only reason why people say he is no longer in his prime is because he got his ass kicked by Hopkins!

          And when exactly was Glen Johnson in his prime then? He was 32-0 when Hopkins TKO'd him in the 11th. After that he never had a stretch of winning more than 4 fights in a row.

          Hopkins has one of the best resumes out of any active fighter and has one of the greatest careers out of any active fighter. You can name only a few that have accomplished more or have more impressive resumes. It's clear that anything hopkins has done, you have some sort of excuse or counter for.

          Why you continue to hate on Hopkins is beyond me (and you've been doing so for a very long time).

          We understand you don't like him, that's cool. But to deny the man of any credit is simply being extremely biased and you're obviously not willing to admit the man has accomplished a ton (again, much more then most active fighters by far) in the sport.
          Johnson was fighting far lower level fighters than Hopkins. His previous 17 opponents (Glen was only once in middleweight limit) totalled 177 wins to 267 losses. And he took the fight on very short notice, needing to make weight. He's spoken about it.

          Comment

          • ИATAS
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 36648
            • 2,509
            • 1,953
            • 50,835

            #65
            Originally posted by edgarg
            Johnson was fighting far lower level fighters than Hopkins. His previous 17 opponents (Glen was only once in middleweight limit) totalled 177 wins to 267 losses. And he took the fight on very short notice, needing to make weight. He's spoken about it.
            So are you implying that Glen Johnson was better than Hopkins and would have beat him in his prime?

            And if we're going to go with that excuse, then Hopkins loss to Roy Jones was because hopkins had only 20-23 fights and wasn't fighting the greatest opposition either. In addition, Jones had a great Amateur career and fought in the Olympics, whereas Hopkins was serving 5 years in prison and was involved in their boxing program, which had much less skilled fighters than that seen by Jones in the Olympics and the Amateurs.

            Seriously, trying to discredit his win over Johnson is silly (hopkins is, and always was, a much better fighter then Johnson)

            Comment

            • Gatti9783
              Undisputed Champion
              • Jul 2006
              • 1020
              • 89
              • 11
              • 7,390

              #66
              Originally posted by moofo
              Wrong again ****wit.
              My avatar does NOT have a British flag.
              It doesn't have any flag in it that is recognised anywhere in the world.


              Is this a British flag or not? Is it anywhere in your AVI? That's what I thought. We got a bright one here folks. Same brain this priceless boxing chatter comes from
              Last edited by Gatti9783; 04-04-2008, 05:45 PM.

              Comment

              • ИATAS
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 36648
                • 2,509
                • 1,953
                • 50,835

                #67
                Originally posted by Gatti9783


                Is this a British flag or not? Is it anywhere in your AVI? That's what I thought. We got a bright one here folks. Same brain this priceless boxing chat comes from
                He's going to come back and say, "but it ALSO has the American FLAG in it, which isn't recognized by anyone in the WORLD, IDIOT YANKS!!! Plus, the picture in my sig is from SNATCH, which was directed by GUY RITCHIE who's from the UK but the picture is of BRAD PITT, who is AMERICAN, IDIOTs!!!!! I swear you munchkins are so freakin ******, go eat McDonals lazy elfs! X 1,000

                Comment

                • Gatti9783
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 1020
                  • 89
                  • 11
                  • 7,390

                  #68
                  Originally posted by natas206
                  He's going to come back and say, "but it ALSO has the American FLAG in it, which isn't recognized by anyone in the WORLD, IDIOT YANKS!!! Plus, the picture in my sig is from SNATCH, which was directed by GUY RITCHIE who's from the UK but the picture is of BRAD PITT, who is AMERICAN, IDIOTs!!!!! I swear you munchkins are so freakin ******, go eat McDonals lazy elfs! X 1,000


                  Of course his gay ass has a shirtless pic of Brad Pitt in his sig.

                  Comment

                  • xfiles
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 698
                    • 76
                    • 25
                    • 789

                    #69
                    Originally posted by moofo
                    Another ****wit who assumes I am a calzaghe fan.
                    That assumption made reading your bull**** invalid just like your entire life.
                    Loser.
                    OOOOOOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! :wank:

                    Comment

                    • xfiles
                      Banned
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 698
                      • 76
                      • 25
                      • 789

                      #70
                      Originally posted by moofo
                      Winky Oscar & Tito all made their fame below 160.
                      Glen Johnson WAS NOT at his best when he met Hopkins.
                      Tarver was not at his best which was never better than mediocre.

                      And once again ****nut like the rest of you braindead ****s you instantly assume I am a calzaghe fan and British.
                      And you are wrong on both counts YET AGAIN!

                      So when you ever gonna get it right bitchtits?
                      So the **** what? Calzaghe's whole resume full of bums could have been in there utmost prime x10 and it still wouldn't matter. He'd still be nothing but a protected, bum fighter living off Frank Warren's breast milk you ****ing gay, British queen. And by the way, Putting an owned sign at the end of your post makes you a dribbling moron. Other people decide if you owned somebody you dumb ass, fudge packing, **** head. You don't decide yourself.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP