Who has the better resume at 140? Cotto or Floyd.
Collapse
-
This is a ****** question. Cotto had 27 fights at 140 lbs, Floyd only had 3, picking up an alphabet and then moving up. So at 140 lbs Cotto had the better resume. Floyd had the better resume before even moving to 140 lbs, and has the better resume now.
Ricky Hatton, Oscar De La Hoya, Diego Corrales and Jose Luis Castillo are better wins than anyone Cotto has beaten.Comment
-
This is a ****** question. Cotto had 27 fights at 140 lbs, Floyd only had 3, picking up an alphabet and then moving up. So at 140 lbs Cotto had the better resume. Floyd had the better resume before even moving to 140 lbs, and has the better resume now.
Ricky Hatton, Oscar De La Hoya, Diego Corrales and Jose Luis Castillo are better wins than anyone Cotto has beaten.
the only reason floyd's is better slightly because of castillo and corrales.he beats margo and mosley again it's even.Comment
-
The best fighter to guys who prefer ccowards and undignifed punks.
Like you.
Me.
I prefer real champs who fights the best instead of ducking them.
I can't believe the level of idiocy Fake Floyd fans will go into. The question was simple and THE WHOLE ****ING WORLD KNOWS IT.
Cotto has a better resume at 140.
****** pricks like this one just continues to amaze me.Comment
-
-
-
This is a ****** question. Cotto had 27 fights at 140 lbs, Floyd only had 3, picking up an alphabet and then moving up. So at 140 lbs Cotto had the better resume. Floyd had the better resume before even moving to 140 lbs, and has the better resume now.
Ricky Hatton, Oscar De La Hoya, Diego Corrales and Jose Luis Castillo are better wins than anyone Cotto has beaten.
Mosley trumps all those fools....
Comment
-
Simple question, and the answer is easy, Cotto.
Doesn't mean much as Floyd has a better resume overall.
Too bad Floyd didn't fight Cotto at 140, and instead went after the much easier Gatti. I guess you have to cherry pick if you want belts in 5 divisions.Comment
-
Comment
Comment