Tweet
What will your opinion be about him??
-
31He's the British bum we all new he was, many years ago16.13%5He had an off nigh and was beaten by the better man38.71%12Bitchkin is the greatest of all time9.68%3I guess, styles do make fights35.48%11 -
Hopkins is the better man, I won't think any less of Calzaghe. -
both are great fighters. the better man wins.Comment
-
Sorry for the spelling errors in the poll. I'm a dumb yank!
Comment
-
It all depends on how it happens. He can't get a freak injury, unfair refereeing, or he can get outboxed.
The latter is extremely unlikely.
Hatton-Mayweather was a more evenly matched fight, and that was far from evenly matchedComment
-
-
Losing to a 43 y/o will affect how Calzaghe is regarded on an all time basis. You look at a list of the great fighters of all time and none of them ever lost in thier prime to someone even nearly that old.Comment
-
I can't answer this question as a i just can't envisage this happening.Comment
-
I personally would be thinking USA USA USA USA USA.
If Hopkins beats him then he is one of the greatest fighters of the modern era. I can't even fathom it.
I doubt he would have beat Joe 6 years ago. He definetely won't win this one.
Stylistically Nard has a chance, but he has to up his workrate significanty. People discount workrate all of a sudden, but that's why Joe wins this fight. Nard is too old to keep up with the activity.
One or two sweet counter shot a round, aint winning ****.Comment
-
I would think a man that everybody has in their top ten P4P beat another guy movign up in weight to fight him. Nah really i will think DAMN Borehard! You really used yo head dere son!Comment
Comment