which fight was closer Pacman v Marquez 2, PBF v Castillo and who won

[flipbjefrox]

pacquiao won the fight... the deciding factor was the kd... pac's win was more convincing because he staggered jmm multiple times and put him down on his @ss. Jmm falling on his ass just erased his case for winning the fight

[Flab]

pacquiao won the fight... the deciding factor was the kd... pac's win was more convincing because he staggered jmm multiple times and put him down on his @ss. Jmm falling on his ass just erased his case for winning the fight

Another pacfan that turned off after the 3rd round.

[flipbjefrox]

Another pacfan that turned off after the 3rd round.

and another angry gaylander who's still upset losing his gayland bucks

[Dynamite Kid]

Another pacfan that turned off after the 3rd round.

yep

If JMM was more high profile people would not be saying STFU and accept the defeat ,the fact is it is acceptable to rob him of the Decision cause it is Pacquaio a high profile fighter

[flipbjefrox]

yep

If JMM was more high profile people would not be saying STFU and accept the defeat ,the fact is it is acceptable to rob him of the Decision cause it is Pacquaio a high profile fighter

and why is it a robbery cuz your man lost? it was a closed fight, press are split, it was a split decision, and in a close fight knockdowns does make a difference since we score rounds in a 10 pts system..

But you lost all your credibility when you call a close fight a robbery.

wanna know robbery watch
santa cruz vs. cassamayor
how about chavez vs. whitaker.

[Flab]

yep

If JMM was more high profile people would not be saying STFU and accept the defeat ,the fact is it is acceptable to rob him of the Decision cause it is Pacquaio a high profile fighter

Boxing is all about the $$$ these days.

[Silencers]

yep

If JMM was more high profile people would not be saying STFU and accept the defeat ,the fact is it is acceptable to rob him of the Decision cause it is Pacquaio a high profile fighter

I don't see how you can call a close fight that could've gone either way a robbery.

[Flab]

I don't see how you can call a close fight that could've gone either way a robbery.

Close fights go to the champion, Marquez was the champion.

[Dynamite Kid]

and why is it a robbery cuz your man lost? it was a closed fight, press are split, it was a split decision, and in a close fight knockdowns does make a difference since we score rounds in a 10 pts system..

But you lost all your credibility when you call a close fight a robbery.

wanna know robbery watch
santa cruz vs. cassamayor
how about chavez vs. whitaker.

i aint a Marquez fan

Pacquaio fans are the only ones making out it was a close fight to cover up the fact that their man lost in reallity ,it was'nt a robbery but we all know who won the fight & there is no way Pacman won that fight at the very best he should have only gotten a draw

[flipbjefrox]

I don't see how you can call a close fight that could've gone either way a robbery.

it's cuz theyre sad that jmm lost. let's face it. pac is the man like it or not/

they say jmm has superior boxing skills but how come he couldnt dominate a one trick pony like pacquiao. Why? cuz jmm's talent is not far from pacquiao that jmm let pacquiao out work him for a victory.

Official score- pacquiao won the Wbc superfeatherweight title