Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ROBBERY!! Pacquiao won 4 rounds!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    there's a difference between a robbery and a close fight

    Comment


    • #82
      it was close but marquez counterpunched the **** out of him, the judges get wooed by pacman coming in with quick combinations, even if they don't land. they should be forced to fight again, two fights and no clear winner if you ask me., i thought marquez did enough to win though

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by BennyST View Post
        This is what I've been trying to figure out...everyone, from the commentators to the press row scorers, said Pac needed the last two rounds and he simply lost them...period.

        Man, I feel so sorry for Marquez. This was his time to shine and beat Pacquiao clearly I thought. It was no robbery but it was a clear victory. The really pathetic thing I thought was Pacquiao completely refusing a rematch after it.

        Marquez fought with a badly cut head butted eye, which in the Morales fight Pacquiao had a fit about and said thats the reason he lost, and still won and yet Pacquiao refuses him a rematch?!?!? Isn't Pacquiao meant to be boxings ultimate warrior? Willing to fight anyone, anytime?

        There were 2 cuts on Marquez' eye. The bigger cut was caused by a punch..

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by dansweeney View Post
          it was close but marquez counterpunched the **** out of him, the judges get wooed by pacman coming in with quick combinations, even if they don't land. they should be forced to fight again, two fights and no clear winner if you ask me., i thought marquez did enough to win though
          he did but the difference this time was pac's defense was tighter. i didn't even see jmm used his uppercut...prolly wary of pac's both hands now. but again, most boxing fans are blinded by a counter puncher. however, pac threw he harder and punishing punches and was the one initiating most of the actions.

          pac controlled agression served him well last night. i was surprised he threw more jabs than marquez. pac's showed a lot of improvement last night. he still look awkward at times but he fought a more matured and intelligen fight. jmm showed some good head movements too and was harder for pac to land the devastating left straight and right hook. props to both fighters for a great fight. now if jmm could just have been a gracious loser... pac might have given him one more chance. nah, it's his difficulty in making the 130-lb limit, i think.

          well jmm can still hang in the 130's and still get a belt...but he better hurry. the young guns are coming.

          cong**** to manny for finally getting a world titles after a long while.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by chipsandsalsa View Post
            oh shut up! why would there be another rematch? it'll end up the same way. it was no robbery. a robbery is when marquez beat barrera.
            Take it easy mate. lol Try reading what I wrote before getting all hot around the collar. I never said it was a robbery. I said I thought, as most people did, that it was a close but clear victory for Marquez and I guarantee that in a rematch it would go to Marquez. He just knows how to beat Pacquiao.

            Again, I was wondering more than anything why Pacquiao refused a rematch? It would be the most lucrative for him in terms of money since most people thought it was not a clear victory for him. There is no one else that has fought 24 rounds with him and won about 18 of them.

            You seriously believe that Marquez got a gift over Barrera? You think Barrera beat Marquez but Marquez lost this fight? You've got some pretty weird concepts on judging a fight obviously if you think Marquez/Barrera was a robbery. God, why are some people so ******?

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by texanballer View Post
              geez what a robbery. Marquez won 8 rounds. He had a good clean knockdown and that was it. In the rounds he won he landed hard shots and the rest of the time he got out gunned and got hit with clean punches



              haha stfu u ******. admit it lol. ***in hater

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by nathanmania View Post
                Deal with it yall maggots.
                They all scored round 1 for Pacquiao?

                I can't believe that one guy scored round 9 for Marquez either. It was close, but it should have gone to Pacquiao.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by warp1432 View Post
                  They all scored round 1 for Pacquiao?

                  I can't believe that one guy scored round 9 for Marquez either. It was close, but it should have gone to Pacquiao.
                  Round 9 was Manny's round. I guess that makes up for the idiot who gave Pac the 12th round.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    here get some milk and quit whining suckers

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by RiZOOM View Post
                      It was a major robbery, I gave pacman 2 maybe 3 rounds. The KD didnt mean **** because Marquez won round 8; 10-8 pacman only landed 5 punches in 8 Marquez landed over 20.
                      i scored the 8th round 10-8 for Marquez also! that body shot was viscious!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP