After Joe Calzaghe beats Hopkins, what will the haters excuses be?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kbpoetree
    Coach/Boxer/TheSport
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 2979
    • 338
    • 471
    • 14,341

    #11
    well i'm one of the Hopkins gr8 fans...and nah i figure if he willen to take the fight...NO EXCUSES ...Joe aint too young himself tho...it wont b cause he old..itl b cause he changed his style too much or simply cause Joe had a better gameplan...if Joe wins does that make him the better boxer...mmm not really necessarily some fighters have their good and bad dayz..just happens..for the record tho...i wont use the too old excuse...mayb tho the judges were wrong excuse tho...lol

    Comment

    • ИATAS
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 36648
      • 2,509
      • 1,953
      • 50,835

      #12
      Originally posted by reedickyaluss
      Bernard being old really isnt an excuse... its a pretty valid reason.
      Exactly, b-hop is ancient and is the only reason I'm worried he might lose.

      I sill think he's going to pull it off somehow, someway.

      But unfortunately none of us really know how the fight would have gone down if both fighters were in their primes.

      Comment

      • Derranged
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 46593
        • 2,126
        • 1,351
        • 162,628

        #13
        Originally posted by reedickyaluss
        Well I cant speak for the other people... but I think joe put himself in a predicament.... if bernard beats you... a 43 yr old beat you... if joe beats bernard... he beat a 43 yr old boxer... and those arent excuses those are actual facts...
        I for one kinda hope joe wins... cuz i want him to fight roy.
        I agree with this.

        Comment

        • Sin City
          la mala vida
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2006
          • 27551
          • 1,757
          • 2,208
          • 47,596

          #14
          Hopkins is a dinosaur.. he had a rough as time with Winky who is much smaller then him and had to head butt his way to a victory.
          No, excuse there it's just truth..
          Calzaghe for the most part until no has fought nobodies but **** beats shot on anyday.

          Comment

          • Ironside
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 2478
            • 94
            • 201
            • 8,897

            #15
            Originally posted by reedickyaluss
            Bernard being old really isnt an excuse... its a pretty valid reason.
            IMO, it's an excuse, if he is so old, he shouldn't be ranked so highly.

            Comment

            • The Hammer
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 50797
              • 3,416
              • 8,704
              • 58,851

              #16
              Originally posted by Ironside
              IMO, it's an excuse, if he is so old, he shouldn't be ranked so highly.
              Exactly. If Hopkins is so old, why does Ring Magazine rate him on the p4p list above Calzaghe, Pavlik, Haye, etc? BoxRec has Hopkins as #1 p4p!

              Those lists are supposed to be based on the current p4p.
              Last edited by The Hammer; 03-13-2008, 06:05 PM.

              Comment

              • Ironside
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2007
                • 2478
                • 94
                • 201
                • 8,897

                #17
                Originally posted by Tunney
                Exactly. If Hopkins is so old, why does Ring Magazine rate him on the p4p list above Calzaghe, Pavlik, Haye, etc? BoxRec has Hopkins as #1 p4p!

                Those lists are supposed to be based on the current p4p.
                I always say this over and over and all the posters that say he's too old never give a reply.

                Comment

                • Easy-E
                  Gotta want it
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 22686
                  • 865
                  • 1,743
                  • 32,777

                  #18
                  Originally posted by ♥boxing♥
                  What will all the haters say? All these ppl are picking hopkins to win, after Calzaghe beats hopkins are all those same haters going to say that he only beat hopkins because hopkins is old? I bet you they will even though they're there same users picking hopkins to get the upset.
                  I dont really get what you mean by "excuses"
                  Hopkins is too old, and he is not even close to the fighter he once was.
                  He has little shot to beat Joe, and if he gives Joe alot of trouble, it shows more about how good Calzaghe REALLY is.

                  Comment

                  • Easy-E
                    Gotta want it
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 22686
                    • 865
                    • 1,743
                    • 32,777

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Tunney
                    Exactly. If Hopkins is so old, why does Ring Magazine rate him on the p4p list above Calzaghe, Pavlik, Haye, etc? BoxRec has Hopkins as #1 p4p!
                    Those lists are supposed to be based on the current p4p.
                    Im not sure how long you have been a fan of boxing or researched it online, but EVERYONE, and I repeat, EVERYONE, knows that boxrec is not even close to a credible source.

                    And that Hopkins is there is more of a technicality, beating Tarver and Wright (two higher profile names than JOe has ever faced in his entire career) puts him in that position, even if his age and actual skill level do not accuretly represent his position on the p4p list.

                    Comment

                    • Ironside
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 2478
                      • 94
                      • 201
                      • 8,897

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Easy-E
                      Im not sure how long you have been a fan of boxing or researched it online, but EVERYONE, and I repeat, EVERYONE, knows that boxrec is not even close to a credible source.

                      And that Hopkins is there is more of a technicality, beating Tarver and Wright (two higher profile names than JOe has ever faced in his entire career) puts him in that position, even if his age and actual skill level do not accuretly represent his position on the p4p list.
                      Not just Ring Magazine, but a lot of individuals as well have Hopkins rated above Calzaghe, and the thing is, and 90% of those people that say Hopkins should be rated higher, and he is going to win, say, "Even if he loses, B-Hop is old, he would have beaten him 6 years ago"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP