Who is more Exciting Haye ,Cotto ,Pavlik

[Dynamite Kid]

HaHA.. Ahem.. Uh, yeah.. Uh... Not crazy. But that's not the point. I never said crazy.. HaHA.. Anyway, Hearns was 87 YEARS OLD when he lost a split decision to Barkely. The point was we generally use these hypotheticals when fighters were in their prime. Unless we want to start using the 1980 version of Muhammad Ali in "Fantasy Fights.."

Well that verison of Hearns dominated Ray Leonard and outboxed Virgil Hill

does'nt matter how old he was he was still open to left hooks and he was still vulnerable Durability wise and Barkley has always had a terrible defence

Addison ridiculous comparisons LOL , Holyfield v Ibragimov to Tito v Hearns and now Ali for his Larry Holmes days to Hearns from the early 90's Who had just dominated Leonard and outboxed a good unbeaten Natural 175 lbs champion in Virgil Hill

[-Antonio-]

Haye is not even the most exciting guy in his own weight class. Well wasnt...

Ever seen Bell fight?

[Addison]

Well that verison of Hearns dominated Ray Leonard and outboxed Virgil Hill

does'nt matter how old he was he was still open to left hooks and he was still vulnerable Durability wise and Barkley has always had a terrible defence

Addison ridiculous comparisons LOL , Holyfield v Ibragimov to Tito v Hearns and now Ali for his Larry Holmes days to Hearns from the early 90's Who had just dominated Leonard and outboxed a good unbeaten Natural 175 lbs champion in Virgil Hill

Did you just get back from youtube? (J/K)

Anyways, ok Terrible.. I understand you're convinced already.

What was your other Boxingscene account anyways? You sound familiar.

[Addison]

Haye is not even the most exciting guy in his own weight class. Well wasnt...

Ever seen Bell fight?

Yeah, he's a cardiac kid, true. ^ No denying that.