Who is more Exciting Haye ,Cotto ,Pavlik

[baya]

Indeed. That must have been very hard for you.

The inner struggle to push the "submit reply" button must have been an epic struggle.. I can picture your finger trembling, hovering..

actually, no. none of that happened, but cute delivery nonetheless.

[Addison]

actually, no. none of that happened, but cute delivery nonetheless.

Except I was redundant with "struggle." I changed it but I was too late.

It made it into your reply..

[Dynamite Kid]

Huh? You lost me, but I think I lost you before that..

well u dismiss the claim that Tito could beat Hearns

by saying yeah and ibragimov could beat Holyfield ,so i come to the conclusion u are comparing Ibragimov chances of beating Holyfield to Tito chances against Hearns which is crazy to say the least cause Ibragmiov cant punch as hard as Tito p4p and Holyfield can take punishment and Hearns could'nt

[Addison]

well u dismiss the claim that Tito could beat Hearns

by saying yeah and ibragimov could beat Holyfield ,so i come to the conclusion u are comparing Ibragimov chances of beating Holyfield to Tito chances against Hearns which is crazy to say the least cause Ibragmiov cant punch as hard as Tito p4p and Holyfield can take punishment and Hearns could'nt

HaHA.. Ahem.. Uh, yeah.. Uh... Not crazy. But that's not the point. I never said crazy.. HaHA.. Anyway, Hearns was 87 YEARS OLD when he lost a split decision to Barkely. The point was we generally use these hypotheticals when fighters were in their prime. Unless we want to start using the 1980 version of Muhammad Ali in "Fantasy Fights.."

[Addison]

HaHA.. Ahem.. Uh, yeah.. Uh... Not crazy. But that's not the point. I never said crazy.. HaHA.. Anyway, Hearns was 87 YEARS OLD when he lost a split decision to Barkely. The point was we generally use these hypotheticals when fighters were in their prime. Unless we want to start using the 1980 version of Muhammad Ali in "Fantasy Fights.."

Yeah, I should of went to sleep last night.. Or maybe I should start using Boxrec.. They fought before that. My bad. Hearns was only 75 when they fought the first time. My bad.

[baya]

Except I was redundant with "struggle." I changed it but I was too late.

It made it into your reply..

redundant would be the approach you take in threads mentioning an opinion on cotto; hey, at least you're consistent!

any more bets on cotto / gomez? i'll bet the house on cotto, again, and you'll make a litany of threads about cotto, again, and then you'll lose, again, and then i'll lose my points won from you in an online arcade game that i have no idea of how to play, again.

[The Hammer]

It's definitely Kelly Pavlik.

His fight against Miranda last year was the most exciting of 2007 IMO, and the other two against Zertuche and Taylor were awesome as well.

[Addison]

redundant would be the approach you take in threads mentioning an opinion on cotto; hey, at least you're consistent!

any more bets on cotto / gomez? i'll bet the house on cotto, again, and you'll make a litany of threads about cotto, again, and then you'll lose, again, and then i'll lose my points won from you in an online arcade game that i have no idea of how to play, again.

You can lose points on those games?? Damn..

Yeah, I'll bet. How much? Not too much.. You already took my other points..

I don't have very many.

[baya]

You can lose points on those games?? Damn..

Yeah, I'll bet. How much? Not too much.. You already took my other points..

I don't have very many.

dude, i'm thinking i should be donating points to you.

addi - i'm inclined to think that you have a betting problem that i'm not the first one who's mentioned it.

[Addison]

dude, i'm thinking i should be donating points to you.

addi - i'm inclined to think that you have a betting problem that i'm not the first one who's mentioned it.

It's alright.. My luck will turn.

This next one, that's all I need..