Marvin Hagler VS Kelly Pavlik at 160lbs

**MELLY-MEL...** · 03-09-2008, 07:22 PM

Hagler no question!

**Karlos81** · 03-09-2008, 07:23 PM

Hagler KO.

Hagler post 85 UD.

**BrooklynBomber** · 03-09-2008, 07:24 PM

Hagler, and relatively easy.
Prime Hagler was a very good counterpuncher and he would easily work the laps in Pavlik's defense. Imo, he would probably get a wide decision.

**Domain** · 03-09-2008, 07:25 PM

Hagler

That guy was a tank, plus if kelly tried pressing hagler he wouldnt be able to because hagler would be the guy pushing kelly back instead if they were both in the middle hagler would just wear him down so bad.

**Hitman932** · 03-09-2008, 07:33 PM

only way you pick anyone to beat hagler is for the sake of being a ****

**Jim Jeffries** · 03-09-2008, 07:38 PM

Pavlik is still pretty young, and he still might improve considerably. As it stands right now, he doesn't stand that much of a chance against Marvin, who had a very long reach for his height, which would negate the difference in height.

**Brother Blues** · 03-09-2008, 07:42 PM

Was this a serious question???

**tyson** · 03-09-2008, 07:59 PM

Originally posted by Hitman932

only way you pick anyone to beat hagler is for the sake of being a ****

Agree!

**Left2body** · 03-09-2008, 08:03 PM

Hagler for sure.......but I would go Hagler via decapitation if Pavlik had to weight-in the day of the fight. Pavlik like Taylor has a fight weight of a Light HeavyWeight.

Lets compare oranges to oranges and not apples here. In todays boxing world Hagler can be compared to Margarito, Cotto and the like. Who would win DLH-Hagler @ 147 or 154 is a legit question IMO.

Marvin Hagler VS Kelly Pavlik at 160lbs