Was Zab Judah the undisputerd 147 lb champ when he TKO'd Spinks?

[Mike Tyson77]

I know he was, but this dumbass JoartCC said he wasnt. What a moron.

[C'MONMANG']

I know he was, but this dumbass in my other Zab thread said he wasnt. What a moron.

he was the Ring champ, no doubt.

[Silencers]

He was the lineal champion.

[Mike Tyson77]

****, I should have made the poll public, cause now Ill get some smartass's saying no.

[BrendanWoodside]

I know he was, but this dumbass JoartCC said he wasnt. What a moron.

100% was and that dude is a dumb ass

[C'MONMANG']

I know he was, but this dumbass JoartCC said he wasnt. What a moron.

define undisputed.

[Mike Tyson77]

100% was and that dude is a dumb ass

He is pretty ******.

[Mike Tyson77]

define undisputed.

Beats the lineal champ and has the WBC/WBA/IBF. Which made Zab the true champ in 2005 at 147.

[Taco Breath]

No He Wasnt!!! He Ducked Margarito!!!! Most Feared Man On The Planet!!!!!!

[Fox McCloud]

Obviously he was...

I have noticed though that the more times a lineal championship changes hands, the less credible the champion seems to be.

Mosley beats Oscar. Considered the best in the sport.

Forrest beats Mosley. Less credible than Mosley was it seemed, considering his name didn't take off like Mosley's did.

Mayorga beats Forrest. Some people consider it a fluke, others detract from Mayorga's lack of technical skill.

Spinks beats Mayorga. Claims of a bad decision.

Judah beats Spinks. After going 1-1 in the series with no rubber to decide it.

Baldomir beats Judah. F-L-U-K-E.

Follow the line of people that had the welterweight title... doesn't it seem to get worse every single time it changes hands? Something interesting to think about?