Peter's Blocking tactics...
Collapse
-
Comment
-
A punch to the back of the head is a punch to the back of head.. SO yes I CAN compare..
I repeat.. a Punch to the back of the head.. is a punch to the back of the head..
Who throws it is irrelavent..
And HAtton won by 4th round KO....Comment
-
No, it's not. Peter hit Wlad cause Wlad was allover the place, if Wlad was not holding like that, Wlad would've not been punched in the back of the head, like that.Comment
-
Please dont make drag up all of sam peters videos.. His clubbing rabbit punch is his specialty...
Again.. Wlad won Peter lost.. get over it..
Plus a punch to the abck of the head.. is a punch to back of the head.. there is no and/ifs/buts/so about it..Comment
-
Peter is wild, but it was Wlad's holding that cause most of the fouls.
Yes Wlad won a close fight and I didn't create this thread or the other thread. Maybe you should get over it.
No, it's not! Watch Zab against Floyd, you will see the difference.Comment
-
A close fight???? You mean a virtual shutout... The score should have been 119-109.. givng the one valid KD in a round dominated by Klitschko anyway..
Goony.. if it lands on the back of the head..It dont matter who threw it or how.. It's an ilegal shot..It's not open to debate..Comment
-
If the knockdowns were not legitimate then you can also say Wlad should have been disqualified for the 10 minute holding he did. If Mills Lane would've been the referee, Wlad would've been disqualified like the same way he disqualified Akinwande against Lennox Lewis.A close fight???? You mean a virtual shutout... The score should have been 119-109.. givng the one valid KD in a round dominated by Klitschko anyway..
Goony.. if it lands on the back of the head..It dont matter who threw it or how.. It's an ilegal shot..It's not open to debate..
If an illegal shot is done intentionally, that is the only time a referee will deduct a point form a fighter. Like I said watch the Zab punch and see the difference.Comment
Comment