Best Prime Fighter of the Featherweight Fab 4

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • msagrain
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 9540
    • 782
    • 688
    • 21,815

    #31
    You should of added Chris john!

    Comment

    • warp1432
      the mailman
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2007
      • 14406
      • 478
      • 347
      • 24,060

      #32
      I just can't decide. Maybe Morales?

      When do you consider prime for each fighter?

      Comment

      • Fox McCloud
        Mission Complete!
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 18176
        • 789
        • 1,151
        • 26,037

        #33
        Originally posted by msagrain
        You should of added Chris john!
        Why?!? He has only beaten Marquez, which many call a horrible decision.

        The four up there basically fought in a round robin with the exception of Marquez and Morales.

        And you would be hard-pressed to find someone who would put Chris John in the league of these four guys in their primes.

        Comment

        • Fox McCloud
          Mission Complete!
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 18176
          • 789
          • 1,151
          • 26,037

          #34
          Originally posted by warp1432
          I just can't decide. Maybe Morales?

          When do you consider prime for each fighter?
          Well that's not up to me!

          That's up to you!

          Personally, I think Morales's prime is at 122, Barrera's at 126, and I'm not 100% sure about Pacquiao or Marquez.

          Comment

          • warp1432
            the mailman
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 14406
            • 478
            • 347
            • 24,060

            #35
            Well yeah. I'm just wondering if 2003 would still be considered Barrera's prime or not. He got blown away by Pacquiao in that fight.

            I just can't choose between Morales and Barrera. I'd probably go with Barrera, but don't know since he got blown away by Pacquiao.

            One thing is for sure, Morales and Marquez would have been a hell of a fight.

            Comment

            • UnderPressure
              Nilaga
              • Apr 2007
              • 0
              • 27
              • 18
              • 7,287

              #36
              Erik Isaac Morales

              Comment

              • msagrain
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2007
                • 9540
                • 782
                • 688
                • 21,815

                #37
                Originally posted by DWiens421
                Why?!? He has only beaten Marquez, which many call a horrible decision.

                The four up there basically fought in a round robin with the exception of Marquez and Morales.

                And you would be hard-pressed to find someone who would put Chris John in the league of these four guys in their primes.
                ok maybe i was get a bit excited with this kid he is only young but i think he should try to get more big names to prove he is the best.

                Comment

                • Lazy Liberal
                  Welfare Lifestyle!
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2007
                  • 3161
                  • 136
                  • 35
                  • 9,851

                  #38
                  Originally posted by BennyST
                  Huh? Why would anyone insert that dumb prick? He got whooped by Barrera and would have been whooped by Morales and Marquez (and Pacquiao) even worse probably. What most Naz fans seem to dismiss (voluntarily of course) is that after his career was ended by Barrera, Steward came out and said that they deliberately stayed away from Morales and Marquez and thought they had the best chance with Barrera...which turned out to be as bad as any other choice!!!

                  It's too hard to say which was the best. They would probably have all beaten each other equal times. They could have fought each other every month and each one would win a different time. Without a doubt, one of the best periods of fighting ever at this weight!!! Simply stunning! Actually, it was the best period for this weight ever. I don't think we give enough credit to these great guys! Well done Dwiens for bringing up these guys recently a number of times. True boxing icons!
                  Hamed actually beat more high level competition than Marquez did at 126. I said in an earlier post that hamed ducked Marquez for the longest time. I am not a Naz fan but you can't dismiss his run at 126 until the Barrera fight.

                  Comment

                  • Pugilistic™
                    MV3
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 9848
                    • 324
                    • 305
                    • 16,773

                    #39
                    morales, barrera, marquez, pacquaio

                    Comment

                    • Run
                      Outlaw
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 56188
                      • 2,588
                      • 4,569
                      • 76,412

                      #40
                      Kind of misread.

                      Because Morales CLEARLY was the most dominant fighter in his prime of the group. However I think M.A.B. is the ATG of the lot there.

                      Of course they're all ATG's when it's said and done prolly.



                      Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP