Who is the bigger man? Calzaghe Or Hopkins?

**sparked_85** · 02-20-2008, 03:36 PM

I said on another thread I think it's Joe.

**moofo** · 02-20-2008, 03:37 PM

Originally posted by sparked_85

I said on another thread I think it's Joe.

Explain why please.

**D.I.E.S.E.L** · 02-20-2008, 03:37 PM

Joe's BodyFat % is higher, so thats why I voted Bernard.

**Parody** · 02-20-2008, 03:38 PM

Calzaghe is but slightly

**RisAri0** · 02-20-2008, 03:39 PM

Bernard because he has no fat on him it seems like...I can see his body as a cruiser and be ripped like no other...plus he has mackie on his side, nuff said..

**moofo** · 02-20-2008, 03:39 PM

**TheGreatA** · 02-20-2008, 03:43 PM

No significant size advantage for either man.

Hopkins fought most of his career at 160 but he showed against Tarver he could also fight at 175 and looked good.
Calzaghe fought most of his career at a higher weight 168 but can't make the weight anymore so he has to fight at LHW.

Hopkins is slightly taller.

Hopkins

Calzaghe

Hopkins & Calzaghe

**2501** · 02-20-2008, 03:47 PM

a big no **** for this thread.

**sparked_85** · 02-20-2008, 03:50 PM

my reasoning is that Calzaghe would have had to chop his flippin head off to make middleweight. He has looked like ****e in the last few weigh in's. Hopkins always look good.

Also Enzo Maccarinelli said on Setanta once that Joe has to lose up to two stone to make weight. I can't see B-hops walking around at that weight (14 stone)

Hops must have a thinner frame than Calzaghe, otherwise he could never have campaigned for so long at Middleweight.

Who is the bigger man? Calzaghe Or Hopkins?