Well that was a robbery.
Collapse
-
people's facial conditions don't determine who won the fight. Have you seen Michael Katsidis Vs. Czar Amonsot yet? You need to give up boxing just based on that pointless and ignorant comment.Dude please never watch a boxing match again seriously. you are banned.
please explain to me where you saw that pavlik's corner thought they lost the fight?
did you see palvik's face compared to jermaine taylor face at the end of the fight?
give up boxing please you are beyond an idiotComment
-
Comment
-
Robbery...you idiots. Pavlik was way more consistent and was way more active. You could tell that body shot really hurt Jermaine towards the end he even said so. He was also starting to get pushed against the ropes. Kelly was consistent while Jermaine would get in a few nice shots and try to steal em at the end. Props to both of them they each fought a good fight.Comment
-
I guess when it comes to clean punching it doesn't count, if your missing most of the time.
Don't you have to hit people to win? Cause if that's the case.... Lets all miss!!Comment
-
Dude, Pav threw much more and landed more. His jab was better than Taylor's. Sure, Taylor had the edge in power shots, but he landed far less than Pav. It's a game of hit more and get hit less. Pavlik won by being busier and landing more. It's not like Pavlik was being overpowered either. Pavlik kept throwing hard stuff over 12 rnds. Give Taylor credit, but he needed to both throw more and land more to win against a busy, conditioned guy with a very good jab.It was a meaningless fight so I dont know how much I care but:
Pavlik looked very slow
Taylor kept tagging him with his speed
Taylor didnt make his same old mistakes of backing into corners and taking jabs
Pavliks corner felt like they lost
I know people will justify this by saying Taylor robbed Hopkins but the reality is he won those points. I had Pavlik winning 4 rounds at most (the 1st, 9th, and the last 2)Comment
-
Maybe I shouldn't watch enitre replays of fights that I know go the distance. Instead, I'll just watch the final round .... so I can see the condition of their faces.Dude please never watch a boxing match again seriously. you are banned.
please explain to me where you saw that pavlik's corner thought they lost the fight?
did you see palvik's face compared to jermaine taylor face at the end of the fight?
give up boxing please you are beyond an idiot
****ing idiot.Comment
-
wasnt a robberyIt was a meaningless fight so I dont know how much I care but:
Pavlik looked very slow
Taylor kept tagging him with his speed
Taylor didnt make his same old mistakes of backing into corners and taking jabs
Pavliks corner felt like they lost
I know people will justify this by saying Taylor robbed Hopkins but the reality is he won those points. I had Pavlik winning 4 rounds at most (the 1st, 9th, and the last 2)Comment
-
Dude, Pav threw much more and landed more. His jab was better than Taylor's. Sure, Taylor had the edge in power shots, but he landed far less than Pav. It's a game of hit more and get hit less. Pavlik won by being busier and landing more. It's not like Pavlik was being overpowered either. Pavlik kept throwing hard stuff over 12 rnds. Give Taylor credit, but he needed to both throw more and land more to win against a busy, conditioned guy with a very good jab.
Negative.
He threw more and landed the same as Taylor did. Taylor threw less, but the connect percentage was equal to Pavliks missed attempts.Comment
Comment