Stop with the hate and just admit it

[machotime]

So is Gomez really the hardest fight out there besides Floyd? No what about Williams Cintron or Margarito? Torres would tax his ass YES or NO?

Before you say that, consider that at 30+ fights, Floyd was fighting fighters like HENRY BRUSELES and Victoriano Sosa (which Cotto fought at his 18th fight)! hahahaha

[beauty]

OK, you are either 12 years old or you just do not know very much about what makes a great fighter a great fighter.

Mayweather is the most talented fighter right now, but he choses safe fights, ones that he only knows he can win.... Very much like what DLH did.

Those are the makings of a great fighter, great promoter and even greater cross dresser.

[JoartCC]

anytime man



im not 12 and i KNOW what im talkin bout. he is UNDEFEATED and has multiple chamionships in divisions against the best fighters. safe fights yeah right. he gave oscar all the advantages in their fight and Mayweather still taxed him so what. now is gon rematch oscar to prove it wasnt a fluke and this time hes knocking em out.

Undefeated proves nothing.

You'd be an idiot if you think undefeated proves something.

Solis was undefeated before he got KO'd by Pac.

Educate yourself.

Multiple belts mean nothing unless you have beaten the best. Afterall all titles are paper titles.

Freitas, Casa, Spafa, Kostya, Margarito, Cotto, Williams.

Yeah he fought the best.

When were you born kid.

And don't pretend you know something.

Your idiocy exposes itself.

[DrewWoodside]

Undefeated proves nothing.

You'd be an idiot if you think undefeated proves something.

Solis was undefeated before he got KO'd by Pac.

Educate yourself.

Multiple belts mean nothing unless you have beaten the best. Afterall all titles are paper titles.

Freitas, Casa, Spafa, Kostya, Margarito, Cotto, Williams.

Yeah he fought the best.

When were you born kid.

And don't pretend you know something.

Your idiocy exposes itself.

Undefeated is generally a bad attribute in my mind. Its one of the reasons i question Rocky Marciano. I don't know much about him but you always have to assume the competition was suspect if he never marked an L.

[FloydFanatic]

come now and stop with the lyin. now being undefeated is bad? ahaha. you guys owned urselfs. i gues williams and cotto are the worst fighters out there too. maybe its just because Mayweather is so good he cant lose so get over it.
and what do u mean he didnt fight the best. he beat all the champions who were ranked as champion which is the top of the pack. all becuz U want him to fight some1 doesnt mean that person is good. they would all lose to Money Mayweather. every1 picks a person to beat Mayweather and they say this is the guy who is gona do it. he has the strategy and wants it more. then Mayweather taxes him and u girls say the guy sucks. lay off the haterade and try another flava

[BandWagon]

Undefeated is generally a bad attribute in my mind. Its one of the reasons i question Rocky Marciano. I don't know much about him but you always have to assume the competition was suspect if he never marked an L.

I have always thought a loss shows what kind of a champion a guy is. How does he handle the loss? Does he come back and destroy like Jones did Montell Griffin or does he cry about how he was cheated and then suck in every fight after his loss? I would like to see Floyd put to that test. I think that's what you mean by questionable?

[FloydFanatic]

yeah but as soon as he lost peeps would say he sucks and al this crap and wouldnt give him his credit. then he will win the rematch easy and people will either say he stil sucks or make sum excuse. my boy gets 2 much hate

[tredh]

I have always thought a loss shows what kind of a champion a guy is. How does he handle the loss? Does he come back and destroy like Jones did Montell Griffin or does he cry about how he was cheated and then suck in every fight after his loss? I would like to see Floyd put to that test. I think that's what you mean by questionable?

I think being undefeated shows what kind of champion you are also. It shows that the champion basically always can to the fight in shape and brought their "A" game. Even if the champion wasn't on their "A" game they were still good enough to get the win (of course this doesn't take into account bull**** decisions). I don't feel a person has to lose in order to show what they are really made because once you reach a certain level in each and every fight it shows. I say that because once you reach that level competition is better and each and every fighter wants to be the first to give you that first loss and if said fighter can remain undefeated it show even more character because its lonely at the top and the champion also withstood all challengers best and still won the fight.

[hulme#1]

I think being undefeated shows what kind of champion you are also. It shows that the champion basically always can to the fight in shape and brought their "A" game. Even if the champion wasn't on their "A" game they were still good enough to get the win (of course this doesn't take into account bull**** decisions).

Yep, and it's much easier to take that for granted when we talk about what makes greatness.

[DrewWoodside]

I have always thought a loss shows what kind of a champion a guy is. How does he handle the loss? Does he come back and destroy like Jones did Montell Griffin or does he cry about how he was cheated and then suck in every fight after his loss? I would like to see Floyd put to that test. I think that's what you mean by questionable?

Or how the Prince handled it, although i think him getting into a car accident or serving time caused time off that derailed his career.. But he was literally on top of the world b4 the Barrera fight then did nothing after.