Which do you enjoy more?

[Fox McCloud]

An "interesting" tactical matchup between the two top fighters in their division or an all-out, blood and guts war between two fighters who aren't even close to good enough to become a world champion?

[JoeyBB]

The former.

Or a mixture of the two.

[ßringer]

Every boxing fan loves an all out war but when it's between 2 guys who will never be talented enough to win a World Title, it's not interesting enough for me to watch. I'd much rather see two accomplished Champions go tit-for-tat in an intellectual game of boxing chess.

[Ironside]

I would be willing to pay money for the tactical match, because doesn't matter how they fight, gotta see two world-class fighters going at it, the suspense and drama that usually comes with big fights can't be surpassed, but if i was to choose between a tactical matchup or a all out war between fighters I didn't know, I would want to see the war.

[JoeyBB]

An "interesting" tactical matchup between the two top fighters in their division or an all-out, blood and guts war between two fighters who aren't even close to good enough to become a world champion?

BTW, there is an art to going toe to toe and fighting inside....

[Ironside]

Also, why do you ask this question, IMO the better question would have been to world class fighters that like to go all out or two world class tactical fighters.

[FIGHTING_FLIP]

i love fights when theres a little bit of everything..for example leonard-hearns 1

[DiegoFuego]

The point of boxing is to hit and not be hit. I'd rather see two guys who are good at it going at it than two guys who aren't.

[Crazylegs77]

2 fighters who are equally matched

[JoeyBB]

The point of boxing is to hit and not be hit. I'd rather see two guys who are good at it going at it than two guys who aren't.

No it's not. Why are some fighters more popular then others?