Who thinks Cotto can drag Mayweather into a brawl?

[BmoreBrawler]

Cotto can beat floyd without needing to force a brawl if the judges are good.

[Fox McCloud]

Cotto can beat floyd without needing to force a brawl if the judges are good.

12 rounds to nothing because Cotto was moving forward.

[NAPO]

12 rounds to nothing because Cotto was moving forward.

u really think so???

[BmoreBrawler]

12 rounds to nothing because Cotto was moving forward.

Nm, Floyd was the ring general because he moved backwards .

[Fox McCloud]

u really think so???

No, me and BMore argue about whether rounds should be scored based on aggressiveness alone. He says it should be a tiebreaker, and I say that it has to be effective aggression, just moving forward doesn't cut it.

[Fox McCloud]

Nm, Floyd was the ring general because he moved backwards .

Counterpunching is not allowed in the BMoreBrawling book of judging.

[wmute]

Last time I checked it was "effective aggression", aggression alone never mattered.

The only other person I heard arguing against that is judge kaczmarek.

[QuCongee]

I'm actually one of the few who voted yes. If by "drag him into a brawl" you mean "force floyd to fight", which is the way I took it, then yes.

[guzi815]

We all know Mayweather's Uncle Roger "WOULD NEVER" let him brawl with Cotto! That is "ASKING" to get a "1" in the "L" column!

[TopDawg]

No, PBF is going to fight his fight. If he wants to brawl, he will force Cotto to brawl with him, not the other way around.