Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
The 'Non Stop Boxing' forum is visible to all users. To see additional forums please
register
or login.
Where does Hopkins belong pound for pound?
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
2
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
1
2
template
Next
kayjay
A ***** and I'm happy
Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
13652
Received
1,813
Given
5,770
Points:
30,799
Share
Tweet
#1
Where does Hopkins belong pound for pound?
01-17-2008, 12:34 AM
Vote in the poll
22
Voters
15-20
36.36%
8
votes
20-25
31.82%
7
votes
25-30
4.55%
1
vote
Outside the top 30
27.27%
6
votes
Fox McCloud
Mission Complete!
Join Date:
Apr 2007
Posts:
18176
Received
789
Given
1,151
Points:
26,037
Share
Tweet
#2
01-17-2008, 12:36 AM
Pretty hard to take the Tarver win away from him like a revisionist...
His career has been lacking, but... I don't know. Probably around 5. I'll vote when you FINALLY get the poll up.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Fox McCloud
Mission Complete!
Join Date:
Apr 2007
Posts:
18176
Received
789
Given
1,151
Points:
26,037
Share
Tweet
#3
01-17-2008, 12:36 AM
Or you could just forego a fair poll and do that.
I'll abstain.
Comment
Post
Cancel
kayjay
A ***** and I'm happy
Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
13652
Received
1,813
Given
5,770
Points:
30,799
Share
Tweet
#4
01-17-2008, 12:36 AM
I put him at 18 or 19; I had him losing three of his last four
Comment
Post
Cancel
kayjay
A ***** and I'm happy
Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
13652
Received
1,813
Given
5,770
Points:
30,799
Share
Tweet
#5
01-17-2008, 12:38 AM
now of course; this isn't the History Forum
Comment
Post
Cancel
Randall_Hopkirk
Undisputed Champion
Join Date:
May 2007
Posts:
2351
Received
99
Given
131
Points:
8,895
Share
Tweet
#6
01-17-2008, 12:44 AM
#2. No higher, no lower. Isn't p4p about WHO you beat rather than the manner in which you do it?
Comment
Post
Cancel
JoeyBB
Banned
Join Date:
Jan 2008
Posts:
751
Received
60
Given
9
Points:
951
Share
Tweet
#7
01-17-2008, 12:47 AM
10-15......protected middle aged mother ****er.
he should retire.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Jim Jeffries
rugged individualist
Join Date:
Oct 2007
Posts:
20740
Received
1,376
Given
2,868
Points:
54,838
Share
Tweet
#8
01-17-2008, 12:49 AM
Originally posted by
Randall_Hopkirk
#2. No higher, no lower. Isn't p4p about WHO you beat rather than the manner in which you do it?
So losing back to back fights against Jermain Taylor means nothing?
Comment
Post
Cancel
kayjay
A ***** and I'm happy
Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
13652
Received
1,813
Given
5,770
Points:
30,799
Share
Tweet
#9
01-17-2008, 09:41 AM
Originally posted by
gavinz1970
So losing back to back fights against Jermain Taylor means nothing?
Exactly. Taylor has to be ahead of Hopkins on any list
Comment
Post
Cancel
Phil McRevis
Banned
Join Date:
Jan 2008
Posts:
163
Received
22
Given
37
Points:
243
Share
Tweet
#10
01-17-2008, 09:56 AM
Originally posted by
Randall_Hopkirk
#2. No higher, no lower. Isn't p4p about WHO you beat rather than the manner in which you do it?
Aye but beatin on wee men instead of fellas your own size does nae help.
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
1
2
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment