Post Hopkins/Calzaghe...
Collapse
-
-
Boxing is all about revisionism? How else are you supposed to evaluate a prospect like Lacy was, until after he fights other guys. Truth is, Lacy has never been impressive on the main stage. That is not Cal-Z's fault, but it is reality.ye are an ignorant wee fanny.
Go back on this very forum and dig out all the pre Lacy Calzaghe fight predictions.
Perhaps you were no watching boxing back then I dunno' ?
Calzaghe gave Lacy a beating that was so complete he destroyed the wee mans confidence forever.
Afore the Calzaghe fight he was KO'ing guys who were better than that bum Manfredo was he no?
Revisionist fool.Comment
-
How many guys has Taylor fought & proven himself at 168 against pal?
ANSWER THAT.
I don't need to tell you who Kessler has beaten you should already know if you are a TRUE boxing fan.Comment
-
I'm not playing guessing games between guys without common opponents. I'm asking for facts. You're playing the guessing games and acting like it's certainty.Comment
-
I know the guys. I'm looking at the Box REc page right now. I want you to tell me which one is better than Taylor.Comment
-
Drew, I feel ****** for arguing with this kid.Some good credit for beating an able Kessler. He looked good in the ring. Decent power, hand speed, footwork and defense. I can't name anyone else with these same credentials cal has fought. I'm not saying Calzaghe isn't an excellent fighter, but we'll never be sure just how good he is b/c he doesn't fight enough Kessler caliber fighters.Comment
-
At 168 they all are.
Reason being Taylor has never fought there pal.
He's UNPROVEN at the weight.
Or are ye telling me he is PROVEN at 168?
Why the need to look on Boxrec you should know Kessler has a solid resume against fighters like andrade , beyer who he sparked in 3 and had never been stopped.
Anthony Mundine another solid fighter at 168.
All three of these guys would give Taylor hell , you know why?
If Corey Spinks could then these guys certainly would and they are much bigger to boot.
Or do you no agree ?
If so we need to quit now pal cos we are goin roond in circles.Comment
-
happy american and scottish phil need to rent a room and work this one outAt 168 they all are.
Reason being Taylor has never fought there pal.
He's UNPROVEN at the weight.
Or are ye telling me he is PROVEN at 168?
Why the need to look on Boxrec you should know Kessler has a solid resume against fighters like andrade , beyer who he sparked in 3 and had never been stopped.
Anthony Mundine another solid fighter at 168.
All three of these guys would give Taylor hell , you know why?
If Corey Spinks could then these guys certainly would and they are much bigger to boot.
Or do you no agree ?
If so we need to quit now pal cos we are goin roond in circles.Comment
-
Taylor killed Cory Stinks.At 168 they all are.
Reason being Taylor has never fought there pal.
He's UNPROVEN at the weight.
Or are ye telling me he is PROVEN at 168?
Why the need to look on Boxrec you should know Kessler has a solid resume against fighters like andrade , beyer who he sparked in 3 and had never been stopped.
Anthony Mundine another solid fighter at 168.
All three of these guys would give Taylor hell , you know why?
If Corey Spinks could then these guys certainly would and they are much bigger to boot.
Or do you no agree ?
If so we need to quit now pal cos we are goin roond in circles.
You're right in naming Mundine. The other guys are beer hall fighters. Mundine is not better than Taylor.
Taylor is not proven at 168. I doubt it will make the kind of difference you're talking about. I think that Taylor AND Pavlik would certainly have a very good chance against Kessler.Comment
-
Lets wait a wee while to pass judgement then eh?Taylor killed Cory Stinks.
You're right in naming Mundine. The other guys are beer hall fighters. Mundine is not better than Taylor.
Taylor is not proven at 168. I doubt it will make the kind of difference you're talking about. I think that Taylor AND Pavlik would certainly have a very good chance against Kessler.Comment
Comment