Joe Calzaghe's 0 Will Go
Collapse
-
-
he lost to jermain taylor twice lost to jones tarver is overrated delahoya and trinidad are welterweights glen johnson overrated wright is his best win and he fought wright at 170 when wright is a 154 fighter bernard fought his whole carrer at 160 and never not got around to fighting wright but fights him at a weight almost 20 pounds over his best weight limitComment
-
Two signs a poster is insecure about their argument and/or losing a debate. 1.) They accuse the other poster of never having been inside the ropes of a boxing ring.. 2.) They ask when the other poster began watching boxing.. 3.) They start name calling.. ******, ***, noob.. and apparently "bellend.".... IMO Calzaghe's resume leaves much to be desired, which would be fine but unfortunately, his fans love to act like he's the second coming of Christ. With that said, save for a slim puncher's chance I think he'd beat Miranda handily, and Tarver I don't give much credit.. but everyone else on that list could be a pickem.
Agreed 100%Comment
-
i don't think bernard is better than kessler he has a better defense than kessler but he is not better than kesslerComment
-
Winky would absolutely win the fight. That shell defense would make Calzaghe's wide slapping punches look even more ridiculous when he isn't landing ****.
Winky wouldn't school him like he did Tito but his jab would win him at least 7 to 8 rounds. Winky, another guy who cannot be dominated.Comment
-
Kessler is a basic European fighter. He has good fundementals and that's all.
There is no way to debate this except compare both their performances against Calzaghe.
Once Hopkins enforces his will on Calzaghe and makes the fight ugly and neutralizes Joe's strenghts and makes all the rounds hard to score, you will see who the better fighter is between Kessler and Hopkins.
All I'm saying is that this will go to the judges and it will be as close as it can get. It will be hard to score and Hopkins will probably pull it off by a close decison that will be debated for a long time.Comment
-
Exactly. Hopkins made that fight as ugly as it is. It was to his advantages to make it as ugly as possible. Winky was just way off his game in that fight due to what Hopkins did. If Hopkins can do that to a guy like Winky, just imagine what he will do to Joe.
Winky is way more skilled then Joe Calzaghe.:banana:Comment
-
You have just discredited Bernard Hopkins's entire career as a fighter yet you expect Joe to get credit for beating him???? At age 43 of all????he lost to jermain taylor twice lost to jones tarver is overrated delahoya and trinidad are welterweights glen johnson overrated wright is his best win and he fought wright at 170 when wright is a 154 fighter bernard fought his whole carrer at 160 and never not got around to fighting wright but fights him at a weight almost 20 pounds over his best weight limit
You need to step your game up man. That kindergarden writing isn't gonna win you a debate.Comment

Comment