After having just watched Calzaghe fight...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kayjay
    A ***** and I'm happy
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2006
    • 13652
    • 1,813
    • 5,770
    • 30,799

    #21
    Originally posted by Orange Sneakers
    Calzaghe was VERY unimpressive in the Salem, Veit, Ashira, Bika, Manfredo and Kessler fights. But against Jeff Lacy - albeit Jeff Lacy, who walked into the MEN Arena holding his girlfriend's hand - he showed off his speed punching and combination ability and natural talent on the backfoot, as Lacy - very visibly tight around the shoulders at the weigh-in - jumped in head-first all night.

    His claim to fame is still knocking down Eubank in 15 seconds with a shot that Chris didn't see coming.
    That's not his "claim to fame." And he was hardly unimpressive against Kessler. You yourself once posted a thread "Joe Calzaghe boxing excellently against Mario Veit," so you can't now say it was unimpressive either

    Comment

    • sparked_85
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 6036
      • 158
      • 97
      • 12,597

      #22
      Joe was unimpressive against Bika,Salem and Ashira for sure.

      You can't put Manfredo on there. Joe tossed him around like a cheap suit. The only bad point was that the ****** ref didn't let us see the next few rounds which would have been ****ing hilarious.

      Comment

      • Makaaveli
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 172
        • 7
        • 1
        • 6,360

        #23
        Calzage reppin the british - BRAP BRAP !

        Ye, he's a fighter with alot of talent

        Comment

        • blacksky
          Contender
          • Nov 2007
          • 473
          • 64
          • 15
          • 6,564

          #24
          JC is a near complete fighter. great chin, great workrate, can box in many different style and is exciting to watch.

          no offence to Hatton but against the top guys has looked weak.

          Comment

          • sparked_85
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 6036
            • 158
            • 97
            • 12,597

            #25
            no offence to Hatton but against the top guys has looked weak.
            at 147, he has too many physical limitations. Its a shame he left Warren. I reckon he'd have got Cotto and beaten him at 140. Like **** would he have fought Collazo either.

            Comment

            • blacksky
              Contender
              • Nov 2007
              • 473
              • 64
              • 15
              • 6,564

              #26
              yeah that Collazo move was ******. I agree with you, Warren gets a bad rep but he would still be undefeated right now, his style just doesn`t transfer across weights.

              Comment

              • SkillspayBills
                Garlic Butter Gang!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2007
                • 29181
                • 2,155
                • 3,739
                • 61,188

                #27
                This has to be a bait thread, you can't watch Cal fight and think he has no talent. He is one of the best fighters on this earth and no bull**** bait thread can change that fact.

                Comment

                • SkillspayBills
                  Garlic Butter Gang!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 29181
                  • 2,155
                  • 3,739
                  • 61,188

                  #28
                  Originally posted by blacksky
                  yeah that Collazo move was ******. I agree with you, Warren gets a bad rep but he would still be undefeated right now, his style just doesn`t transfer across weights.
                  No he wouldn't be undefeated because eventually he would have STILL faced Floyd and he would have STILL lost. You guys act like he has lost 2 or 3 fights by the way you are speaking.

                  Comment

                  • sparked_85
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 6036
                    • 158
                    • 97
                    • 12,597

                    #29
                    Originally posted by SkillspayBills
                    No he wouldn't be undefeated because eventually he would have STILL faced Floyd and he would have STILL lost. You guys act like he has lost 2 or 3 fights by the way you are speaking.
                    yep he would have. But I think would have been matched better. Warren would have got the ill looking Cotto at 140. He might have even got Mayweather in a stadium over here like Wembley. He's a clever guy that Warren.

                    Comment

                    • blacksky
                      Contender
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 473
                      • 64
                      • 15
                      • 6,564

                      #30
                      Originally posted by SkillspayBills
                      No he wouldn't be undefeated because eventually he would have STILL faced Floyd and he would have STILL lost. You guys act like he has lost 2 or 3 fights by the way you are speaking.
                      Had he stayed with Warren he may not have gone to 147, that is my point, thus no floyd fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP