Does Timing always beat Speed?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2501
    upinurgirlsguts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20211
    • 902
    • 49
    • 28,237

    #11
    Mayweather/De La Hoya

    Why, because Floyd is better at speed AND timing. Floyd read Oscar like a sunday comic and made him his little putita.

    Comment

    • sparked_85
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 6036
      • 158
      • 97
      • 12,597

      #12
      Originally posted by Left2body
      I think its more correct to say that Timing CAN beat speed. We saw Kessler lose to Calz, he was able to time Calz with a few uppercuts but Calz caught on a bit and used his superior handspeed to pull off the win.
      I agree JC fought great, but his connection rate wasn't great, but he still won by a wide margin. This is why im not giving Hopkins much of chance, Calzaghe doesn't give a **** if he misses. Nard can't discourage him, unless he pins his toes to the floor and hits a home run and knocks him the **** out. That dirty **** keeps you competitive, its not going to beat Joe Calzaghe.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP