Question.....Who hits harder, Bruno, Ruddock. or Wladimir??????
Collapse
-
-
In all fairness, you never like anything I say and reply to me as well. And when have you ever "owned" me? You still think you win debates when you reply every time and write as much as you can?Comment
-
well,,power is related to the amount of leverage you get in your shots. the more leverage the more power. if your talking pure strength,,,bruno may have been the strongest. like I said,,,it is all debatable. maybe bruno did have the more pure power. I guess only common opponents would be able to answer that one for sureYeah but I thought this was just about pure power and Bruno had that more than almost any other heavyweight. If he had Wladimir's or Ruddock's punching technique he would literally kill guys in the ring. Foreman and Shavers too. Even with the wild swings they were able to be world class so what do I know.
All were able to punch with technique too but didn't really care to.
I can't say any of those three is the most powerful for sure but Bruno to me seems like it with his KO % and the way his knockouts look. He also KO'd some good opposition and had very long arms so he had plenty of leverage.
Bruno didn't hit nearly as often with those big rights as Ruddock and Wladimir though.Comment
-
I never have a problem with what you say.You always get mad because i have an opinion and i dont get that, i think its out of frustration to be honest. I didn't say that Wlad hits harder than Foreman either, i said that he is in Foremans league when it come to acurate power punching and you can make a case that he hits at least as hard, thats what i said. Also, i have been owning you for the past few debates. The first time i owned you was back in the Tyson/Ibeabuchi thread.
Comment
-
I didnt say you were biased. I suggested it,, considering Ive never seen anything outrageous coming from the above mentioned poster. wlad owns is another story. as far as me being biased goes,,,I dont overestimate wladimr,,,,nor do I underestimate him,,I simply tell it as it is and the majority of sensible posters on here seem to agree with me and respect my opinions. as far as chins go,,I said the 3 were pretty equal imo. they were all vulnerable to punchersI wasn't speaking of his posts here, but you might see what i'm talking about when he has the courage to admit he thinks Wlad may have had more power than George Foreman.
And me biased? What, is it a trend to call anyone with a Tyson avatar biased? Tell me where i'm biased please. It seems like that fits you more because you overestimate Wladimir quite often(Even here: I believe you said Wlad has more power and a better chin than these guys as well?)Comment
-
Comment
-
No, you would never get me mad son. Seems like you do, when you 'go out of character' with things like owned smileys and TRY to get ME mad.I never have a problem with what you say.You always get mad because i have an opinion and i dont get that, i think its out of frustration to be honest. I didn't say that Wlad hits harder than Foreman either, i said that he is in Foremans league when it come to acurate power punching and you can make a case that he hits at least as hard, thats what i said. Also, i have been owning you for the past few debates. The first time i owned you was back in the Tyson/Ibeabuchi thread.
If you want to keep saying nonsence like "Haha I have PWNED you so bad!!" why not tell the truth? Truth is, I have answered everything you ever asked me or debated with me, and I was the one getting compliments in those threads(Other knowledgable posters like Sweet Pete and Poet agree with me about your redicilous posts). You are always on the defensive while I prove you wrong and counter your redicilous arguments with real boxing knowledge. I have also exposed your contradicting arguments again and again while you have nothing on ME. Like I said, you seem to be under the impression that continueing to post in a lost argument makes you "own" someone? If not, elaborate how you "owned" me son.
And thanks for confirming my earlier comments about you.Comment
-
Bonecrusher Smith and Witherspoon both punched hard like hell. Bruno's chin wasn't the problem, his stamina and his attitude were. Kind of like Wlad's problems really. They aren't used to taking punches, not that their lights go out every single time they get hit.
Bruno could take punishment but he would just stay still and get hit because he didn't have the stamina and the survival skills to recover.Last edited by TheGreatA; 01-08-2008, 06:03 PM.Comment
-
No debate needed go and watch the Bruno and Wlad losses again then tell me I'm wrong. Wlad has been dropped numerous times and Bruno only once when he was completely exhausted against Bonecrusher. Bruno's problem was never his chin it was his training methods and he never had the stamina to last which is when he got caught and tagged. How many punches did Smith,Witherspoon,Tyson twice and Lewis unload on Bruno when trapped against the ropes but he takes them all still standing on his feet. If Wlad had taken them shots off Tyson and Lewis he would be flat on his back and you could count to 100 and he still wouldn't get back up.Comment

Comment