Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question.....Who hits harder, Bruno, Ruddock. or Wladimir??????

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Big Frank Bruno.

    Technique wasn't the best but sheer power nicks it against these two.

    Comment


    • #92
      Agreed Frank Bruno is the most powerful. Bruno could send his opponents flying out of their shoes.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View Post
        And you claim to be an adult? man seriously, grow up. Its really not that serious. Im half your age and alot more mature than you are. Also, why would i take anything from your posts when its all BS? Thats actually just laughable. I might welcome you to my ignore list but i shouldn't even waste that much time on you. With the time that i waste trading insults with your no knowledge having self, i could be dicussing the upcoming fights with knowledgeable boxing fans who actually knows how to dicuss boxing without giving childish insults and acting like a child. Its laughable the way you act like this because i expose you in every debate we ever had, just get over it.
        Not only do you think you're a Boxing Historian, now you're telling me you're more mature than a grown man like me? Please, for the love of God cut the nonsense for once and stop thinking you're something you aren't. All you have to look at is the way you post. Remember when you "went out of character" and posted a dozen childish "owned" smileys thinking you accomplished something against me?(And right after that were completely outdebated as the other posters confirmed, not your fantasy world) and how you tried to piss me off lately with more of your smileys and failed. Also, when I responded to everything you claimed about Tyson you gave a brilliant comeback like "Ahh you're just another Tyson nuthugger" as an excuse every time. THAT is what's immature son. The only reason i'm bothering with you is because 1- You dissrespected me from the beginning thinking i'm nothing more than just another Tyson homer(Even though the credible people that aren't newbies like you know i'm an objective unbiasd Tyson fan and respect me) and 2- Your idiotic arguments filled with contradicting, biased rants and lastly 3- You think you are the most knowledgeable and mature poster here when frankly you've been exposed a lot of times already, so you are not what you think you are. Sorry to say it, but I can't deal with people like you.

        PS-I never directly insulted you personally. I look at your posts here and judge on that, my posts about you have been accurate. You think they're insults because again, you think you're so smart.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
          Watched more fights? The dude seriously needs to go look at my posted collection in Video Trading Black LOL! Notice, Yaman, how he dodged my refutation and made the same discredited claim that I don't like today's fighters. I think that narrows things down a bit more: By "today's fighters" he really means the Klitschko's and no others. Is there a better example of a closet nuthugger than Southpaw? Yaman an I the same person? LOL! While we have a mutual respect for one another we dissagree on certain things: I'm not a Tyson fan and he is. The difference? I don't demean him and call him ****** for being a Tyson fan and he doesn't me for not being one. Who's the mature ones here? The truth is Southpaw we're laughing at you now because the contortions you go through in every post is truly hysterical.

          Poet
          Exactly, this kid doesn't know how to debate. Especially with established knowledgable posters. The key to a friendly debate is 1-Respect for ALL fighters. So no bias against classic or modern fighters, and 2-Respect to the fellow poster. No name calling like "nuthugger" when he's defending an old fighter. This kid doesn't know how to do any of these and has posted things beyond redicilous.

          Comment


          • #95
            Mike Tyson, who fought both Bruno and Ruddock said the Ruddock was the hardest puncher he faced.

            Comment


            • #96
              Tyson didn't really get hit by Bruno though. Ruddock was much more skilled and accurate and he was able to hit Tyson unlike Bruno.

              Bruno didn't have a good uppercut to catch Tyson with. Those looping right hand bombs just won't hit someone like Tyson.

              Ruddock's uppercut is destructive. But Bruno had power in his jabs, hooks, everything. Too bad he was slow as smoke.


              Bruno hits Tyson at 2:40 but Tyson keeps swinging.
              Last edited by TheGreatA; 01-21-2008, 12:47 PM.

              Comment


              • #97
                Wlad or Bruno hit hardest

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                  Mike Tyson, who fought both Bruno and Ruddock said the Ruddock was the hardest puncher he faced.

                  He fought them both TWICE now that you mention it.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Yaman View Post
                    Not only do you think you're a Boxing Historian, now you're telling me you're more mature than a grown man like me? Please, for the love of God cut the nonsense for once and stop thinking you're something you aren't. All you have to look at is the way you post. Remember when you "went out of character" and posted a dozen childish "owned" smileys thinking you accomplished something against me?(And right after that were completely outdebated as the other posters confirmed, not your fantasy world) and how you tried to piss me off lately with more of your smileys and failed. Also, when I responded to everything you claimed about Tyson you gave a brilliant comeback like "Ahh you're just another Tyson nuthugger" as an excuse every time. THAT is what's immature son. The only reason i'm bothering with you is because 1- You dissrespected me from the beginning thinking i'm nothing more than just another Tyson homer(Even though the credible people that aren't newbies like you know i'm an objective unbiasd Tyson fan and respect me) and 2- Your idiotic arguments filled with contradicting, biased rants and lastly 3- You think you are the most knowledgeable and mature poster here when frankly you've been exposed a lot of times already, so you are not what you think you are. Sorry to say it, but I can't deal with people like you.

                    PS-I never directly insulted you personally. I look at your posts here and judge on that, my posts about you have been accurate. You think they're insults because again, you think you're so smart.

                    Again, its not that serious man, really. We come on here to discuss boxing, not insult each other. Also, give me a link to a debate where i did not give back details and spported the facts that i gave. I have never repeatedly called you a nuthugger in a debate.

                    When i asked you to give me a great fighter that Tyson beat, you give me Larry Holmes (past his prime) Toney Tucker (not great at all) and Tyrell Biggs. (not great at all). Come on, tell me how that is being a knowledgeable poster? Instead of admitting that he has never beaten a great fighter in his prime, you just continue desperatley posting and repeating yourself instead of admitting that he has not beat anyone great.

                    None of my post ridiculous at all. I say that Tua and Byrd was on the level of prime Tyson and you reply by calling me an idiot? That just sounds like a frustrated poster. Just look at Tysons resume, its no better than Byrds or Tua's. Chris Byrd= a two time heavyweight champ. David Tua= has knocked out about 5 world champions. Sooooooooooo how is Tyson on a different level than either of them? With a fighter like Tyson that has not had any set backs and has had a full career, there is no excuses for him. He is only as good as what his resume shows. He simply did not have the heart to be a dominate champion. A great fighter to watch in his prime no doubt. Great skill, power, speed, and brilliant combinations, especially when he was with Cus. He just has those problems.
                    Last edited by slicksouthpaw16; 01-21-2008, 02:14 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by TheManchine View Post
                      Tyson didn't really get hit by Bruno though. Ruddock was much more skilled and accurate and he was able to hit Tyson unlike Bruno.

                      Bruno didn't have a good uppercut to catch Tyson with. Those looping right hand bombs just won't hit someone like Tyson.

                      Ruddock's uppercut is destructive. But Bruno had power in his jabs, hooks, everything. Too bad he was slow as smoke.


                      Bruno hits Tyson at 2:40 but Tyson keeps swinging.

                      Agreed, Bruno was that fearful that he came in tight on both occasions, Tyson as he did with many won the fight even before a punch was thrown.

                      Plus you cannot really compare what one fighter against another based on what an opponent said, I mean Bruno pushed Lewis all over the ring with his jabs whilst Lewis destroyed Ruddock.

                      Each fighter/style is different.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP