Chagaev, Maskaev, Ibragimov....

[-Swizzy-]

Who's the best out of these 3?

my pick is chagaev just cuz he was the first to defeat Valuev who had a 1 ft height advangtage on him. thats really impressive.

[TopDawg]

Ibragimov, Maskev is overrated and Chaggaev is bascially an overrated fighter.

[Dorian]

all of them are overrated but i'd go with.........Ibragimov

[flat1985]

Ibragimov...

[TheGreatA]

all of them are overrated but i'd go with.........Ibragimov

Chagaev obviously. He has beaten the best competition out there, maybe better than ANY heavyweight today. He beat Vladimir Virchis, John Ruiz and Nikolai Valuev. All wins were by close decisions but all decisions were deserved.

He was a great amateur and it seems like he will be a good pro too because of his unorthodox southpaw style, good chin and above average power. He is a bit slow though because he carries a bit too much extra-weight but his conditioning is still good.

Maskaev is good but he is getting older and although he is very tough, he is also very easily knockoutable because of his suspect chin.

Ibragimov is good I guess but he hasn't proven much, Briggs and Holyfield didn't even seem to try and Sultan couldn't put them out. We will see what he is made of against Wlad.

[Dick-Sucker]

Who's the best out of these 3?

my pick is chagaev just cuz he was the first to defeat Valuev who had a 1 ft height advangtage on him. thats really impressive.

When hes injury free, Maskaev. I will never forget him knocking Rahman out of the ring. That was a complete performance.

[Scott9945]

Chagaev is the best. He was impressive beating the giant. Sultan is second but he'll get his chance in the spotlight soon enough. Maskaev wouldn't even be a factor if it wasn't for Hasim Rahman. He is a very distant third.

[Gareth Ivanovic]

IMO it's Chagaev, he's beaten the better competition and even though he fights close fights he usually wins.

[Parody]

Chagaev........

[Zerwas1]

Got Chagaev too