that post was meant in a different context. I was naming guys just to give an idea of the level of fighters that calzaghe hasn't faced in his career. I didn't factor in his age at the time. its a weak argument for the calz fans so I removed his name. I could place back but all the calz fans are gonna be babies and ignore the truth.
No, it's not a weak argument, and you know it, that's why you switched it.
Fact is, at the time, you said yourself that Hopkins is one of the few fighters for him to fight, and you would say Calzaghe has proven himself, but just like most haters, you still refuse to give credit. It's no surprise.
Calzaghe is way overrated. He has yet to beat an elite boxer. How is he rated in the top 2 or 3 p4p? What has he done? I mean if he is so good, why hasn't he fought a great fighter. Kessler is the best he's fought and Kessler is barely an above average boxer. I'm not saying that Calzaghe is bad, but one of the best p4p? I don't think he belongs in the top 10 even. If he gets into the ring with Pavlik, Taylor, or Wright and beats either one of them, than he belongs, otherwise, he is way too overrated.
The truth is you are obsessed with Joe Calzaghe and you have been proven wrong hundreds of times in a single thread. Removing Hopkins' name from the list shows sickening weakness.
lol. If someone proves to me with "facts" not "fantasy" that calzaghe has actually done something in his career, I will stop posting in this thread.
I have yet to be proven wrong. your earlier post is an example of twisted facts.
No, it's not a weak argument, and you know it, that's why you switched it.
Fact is, at the time, you said yourself that Hopkins is one of the few fighters for him to fight, and you would say Calzaghe has proven himself, but just like most haters, you still refuse to give credit. It's no surprise.
It amazes me how anyone can think Pavlik deserves to share a ring with Calzaghe or would even stand a chance. His face would get turned into a pizza.
I like Pavlik, I can't ever take anything away from him and he's a good kid, but against Calzaghe? For ****'s sake, that would just be Calzaghe-Lacy II.
Nobody in their right mind would put this fight together.
I'm not psychic, and I'm not an investigator. I simply stated what was fact, which is you said Hopkins was one of the few that Calzaghe needed to prove himself with, and after Calzaghe beat him you switched it. There's no reason for you to take it out, other than hate. If you weren't a hater you would simply state that Calzaghe has proven himself, by beating one of the fighters that I mentioned he needed to beat.
lol. If someone proves to me with "facts" not "fantasy" that calzaghe has actually done something in his career, I will stop posting in this thread.
I have yet to be proven wrong. your earlier post is an example of twisted facts.
There is no such thing as "twisted facts". A fact just is.
You cannot argue with my earlier post. You won't even answer it because there is nothing at all to argue with. Not one single thing. I state hard facts, or otherwise I shut the **** up.
If this was a fight, I'd have knocked your ass out and sent you home with your teeth in your pocket. To add insult to injury, you'd have to take the bus.
Comment