Calzaghe is overrated

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Crazylegs77
    null and void
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 13101
    • 445
    • 296
    • 21,573

    #351
    Originally posted by nmuburner22
    Pauli fought his ass off..that fight was 6-5 Cotto.

    Lacy and Kessler are nobodies in the sport..Cotto is aabout to fight Floyd or Oscar next.

    When will Calzaghe step up and challenge himself.

    Dawson
    Pavlik
    Lacey is a nobody because Calzaghe completely deystroyed him. Before the fight people acted like Lacey was gonna KO him..

    Comment

    • nmuburner22
      #1 P4P PWNER
      • Feb 2007
      • 2725
      • 133
      • 21
      • 2,925

      #352
      Originally posted by TheManchine
      So you don't think Hopkins is a challenge even though you pick Hopkins against Calzaghe?

      Dawson is good but lets see him beat Johnson first and you have Taylor beating Pavlik so it doesn't make much sense for you to say he should fight a guy who is going to lose in his next fight.

      The opposition Calzaghe beat is better than the opposition Malignaggi has beaten.
      Hopkins is 43 and will still most leikely win...because he is that much better.

      Dawson and Pavlik....hell fight at cruiser....until then Im not impressed.

      Comment

      • sparked_85
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 6036
        • 158
        • 97
        • 12,597

        #353
        Originally posted by nmuburner22
        Pauli fought his ass off..that fight was 6-5 Cotto.

        Lacy and Kessler are nobodies in the sport..Cotto is aabout to fight Floyd or Oscar next.

        When will Calzaghe step up and challenge himself.

        Dawson
        Pavlik
        Lacy's reputation probably exceeded that of the two you mention below specifically Dawson. Taylor would prove a more significant challenge than Pavlik IMO. Anyway you think Hopkin's will beat Calzaghe.............why throw another two names out there.

        Your never going to appreciate Calzaghe so why do you keep setting standards for him to meet to gain your crappy approval? Your ridiculous.

        Comment

        • Dick-Sucker
          **** Thug
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 3305
          • 264
          • 167
          • 6,605

          #354
          Originally posted by nmuburner22
          Pauli fought his ass off..that fight was 6-5 Cotto.

          Lacy and Kessler are nobodies in the sport..Cotto is aabout to fight Floyd or Oscar next.

          When will Calzaghe step up and challenge himself.

          Dawson
          Pavlik
          Kessler?

          How is a top 15 pound for pound fighter a nobody in the sport?

          Comment

          • TheGreatA
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 14143
            • 633
            • 271
            • 21,863

            #355
            You can hate his fans all you want (I don't particularly like them either) but you have to be reasonable. Calzaghe has done well and is fighting Hopkins now.

            Comment

            • Moon
              Born Again Pagan
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2004
              • 1504
              • 90
              • 97
              • 7,814

              #356
              Originally posted by kswizzy99
              Calzaghe is way overrated ..... I don't think he belongs in the top 10 even. If he gets into the ring with Hopkins, Pavlik, Taylor, or Wright and beats either one of them, than he belongs, otherwise, he is way too overrated.
              You seem to say that Pavlik has nothing to prove, while Calzaghe does? I don't think even Pavlik would agree with you.

              Are you sure you're a fight fan? I ask because this post seems like it belongs in the "JustWatchedMyFirstFight.com" forum.

              Comment

              • nmuburner22
                #1 P4P PWNER
                • Feb 2007
                • 2725
                • 133
                • 21
                • 2,925

                #357
                Originally posted by Ultimateboxa
                Kessler?

                How is a top 15 pound for pound fighter a nobody in the sport?
                He aint no damn top 15...gtfo.

                Comment

                • nmuburner22
                  #1 P4P PWNER
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 2725
                  • 133
                  • 21
                  • 2,925

                  #358
                  Originally posted by sparked_85
                  Lacy's reputation probably exceeded that of the two you mention below specifically Dawson. Taylor would prove a more significant challenge than Pavlik IMO. Anyway you think Hopkin's will beat Calzaghe.............why throw another two names out there.

                  Your never going to appreciate Calzaghe so why do you keep setting standards for him to meet to gain your crappy approval? Your ridiculous.
                  Beat Hopkins....convincingly.
                  Beat Dawson.
                  Beat Pavlik or Taylor.


                  Now were talking.

                  Comment

                  • robjr
                    Retro...
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 7982
                    • 742
                    • 408
                    • 14,815

                    #359

                    Comment

                    • -Swizzy-
                      The Wolf
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 8821
                      • 431
                      • 330
                      • 661,075

                      #360
                      Originally posted by Moon
                      You seem to say that Pavlik has nothing to prove, while Calzaghe does? I don't think even Pavlik would agree with you.

                      Are you sure you're a fight fan? I ask because this post seems like it belongs in the "JustWatchedMyFirstFight.com" forum.
                      justwatchedmyfirstfight.com<--very creative........not. pavlik has less to prove than calzaghe. and who cares if pavlik would agree with me or not. that isn't even relavent. cuz I will believe what I believe no matter what. there are a hell of alot more question marks in calzaghe's career than pavliks short career. for one, pavlik has accomplished something that hopkins, winky and spinks couldn't do. he ko'd jermaine taylor.
                      that is more than you can say for any single calzaghe fight. pavlik would ko kessler as well.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP