Originally posted by kswizzy99
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whos resume is better
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GearsOfWar View PostWhy do the black posters on this forum like to start so much ****? They hate Calzaghe because hes ****ing white, give me bad karma for saying that. Thats how you racist pricks are, atleast Calzaghe is entertaining and not back peddling the whole fight like Mayweather.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pins0099 View PostRing magazine didn't seem to think so when they bumped Calzaghe up to #5 on the strength of that win.
Comment
-
Plain and simple Calz's ability and potential doesn't not equal his resume. Not blaming Calz, I'm blaming Warren.
To be honest Pavlik has about as good a resume as Calz. Pavlik's win over Miranda a good hard hitting undefeated (robbed in Germany) young fighter is equal to Calz fighting a good hard hitting undefeated Jeff Lacey.
Pavlik's win over a Linear undefeated champion in Jermaine Taylor is at least equal to Calz beating Kessler which is also a great win versus a champion and legit belt holder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SkillspayBills View PostI can agree with the assessment that Klesser is the cream of the crop in the 168 pound division but Floyd beating Oscar bumped him up.....oh wait..........
Its the B- assessment of Kessler a young hungry champion and A+ assessment of a past it 34 yr old Oscar who unlike Calz hasn't aged so well in terms of boxing ability, thats what I'm contending. Maybe he was A+ back in the day but not now and therefore the PBF victory against him was one for the box office not a fantastic one for his resume thats all I'm saying.
Anyway I will not post in the ridiculous thread anymore, PBF is undeniably
P4P#1 and his resume is tip-top.
Comment
-
Comment