Whos resume is better
Collapse
-
-
Man your posts get more ignorant by the day.Why do the black posters on this forum like to start so much ****? They hate Calzaghe because hes ****ing white, give me bad karma for saying that. Thats how you racist pricks are, atleast Calzaghe is entertaining and not back peddling the whole fight like Mayweather.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Plain and simple Calz's ability and potential doesn't not equal his resume. Not blaming Calz, I'm blaming Warren.
To be honest Pavlik has about as good a resume as Calz. Pavlik's win over Miranda a good hard hitting undefeated (robbed in Germany) young fighter is equal to Calz fighting a good hard hitting undefeated Jeff Lacey.
Pavlik's win over a Linear undefeated champion in Jermaine Taylor is at least equal to Calz beating Kessler which is also a great win versus a champion and legit belt holder.Comment
-
Yeah good point, but I dont really think PBF was kept at #1 just because of his win against Oscar, whereas with Calz you can see a direct correlation with his win and jump up the rankings.
Its the B- assessment of Kessler a young hungry champion and A+ assessment of a past it 34 yr old Oscar who unlike Calz hasn't aged so well in terms of boxing ability, thats what I'm contending. Maybe he was A+ back in the day but not now and therefore the PBF victory against him was one for the box office not a fantastic one for his resume thats all I'm saying.
Anyway I will not post in the ridiculous thread anymore, PBF is undeniably
P4P#1 and his resume is tip-top.Comment
-
Comment