Does Pavlik Make Your Top 10 P4P List?
Collapse
-
I hate to talk trash but I have to agree. The bottom half of that list it just...mucked up. Cotto after Pavlik? Sure, Kelly beat Jermain Taylor. Who...doesn't even belong on a top ten list for most of us...so...I mean.... Among other problems that I saw that stuck out the most to me.
Gimme all your points and I will let you live........
Comment
-
my list has less to do with accomplisments(although considered) than skill as compared to others in their division.True. Doesn't mean their list is any good either. I can see you like the guy. But wouldn't it make it cooler for you to put him on the list when he ACTUALLY deserves it? Skill alone or potential alone don't make up for actual accomplishments. You gotta do it, not be able to do it.
He has no BIG wins other than against a relatively smaller guy, has a WORLD championship, I'll give him that. Other than that, his only other big step up, he lost due to under-training. He's still has less than 20 fights, so has a lot of unanswered questions. I just don't think it's very easy to argue for him to be on the list. That's all.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
i love how your bias leads you to rank jt above pavlik even after he got ktfo by him. yeah he has more natural talent, but pavlik is the stronger fighter with more heart and a good head on his shoulders. pavlik is the better man. and good call on pacman number one, your list is complete **** bcuz your bias bleeds way into what should be a somewhat objective ranking. and are you are tarver fan or what? i hate to be a **** but worst p4p list everHe doesn't make mine (check the sig). I think that just cuz he got a lucky punch while Taylor was up on the scorecards doesn't mean ****. Like Pavlik said in his interview "anyone would go down from that shot." It wasn't nothing but a lucky shot, and you'll see that when Taylor gets the W on Pavlik in their re-match.Last edited by boxing_pundit85; 12-28-2007, 03:41 AM.Comment
Comment