Is the heavy-weight division dead?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • K-Nan
    The Stylistic Nightmare
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2006
    • 17473
    • 1,567
    • 1,844
    • 530,636

    #31
    Originally posted by Welter_Skelter
    What do you know about the 80's or 90's that you didnt READ.. I was there man.. DO YOU GET IT.. I saw it all LIVE.... I have had that ADULT power of Cognitive Though Longer than you have been alive..

    I am going to take the word of MY experince over your intelligence and what you READ any day of the week...
    It's not even a contest...

    This is a decent HW era... It's just Not an American dominated one..
    Umm...

    I think we're talking about me and your ciews on the modern Heavweight era. Not the fights of yesteryear. And I'm saying to you that the division is shallow.

    Comment

    • Welter_Skelter
      Resistance Is Futile
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 16453
      • 1,978
      • 2,288
      • 27,508

      #32
      Originally posted by Kaynan
      Umm...

      I think we're talking about me and your ciews on the modern Heavweight era. Not the fights of yesteryear. And I'm saying to you that the division is shallow.
      OK It's shallow... But then so was every other HW ERA...

      The 70's had 3 Superstars.. and 20000 bums.. The 80's 2 stars and 20000 bums..The 90's 3 greats.. 20000 Bums.. Today there is One Great and 20000 bums...

      Tell me it's Shallow again..

      Comment

      • TheGreatA
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 14143
        • 633
        • 271
        • 21,863

        #33
        That's a quite disrespectful and ignorant statement.

        Comment

        • kayjay
          A ***** and I'm happy
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2006
          • 13652
          • 1,813
          • 5,772
          • 30,799

          #34
          The heavyweight division is strong.

          You guys need to look at HWs from the 70's. Apart from the three champs, none of those chumps could even fight in this division. Look at most of Ali's opponents. Do you rate Chuck Wepner above Ray Austin? Look at Louis's opponents; any of them who he didn't lose to. The division has rarely been deep.

          What's missing today are the big fights, because Don King and others have prevented them.

          Comment

          • K-Nan
            The Stylistic Nightmare
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 17473
            • 1,567
            • 1,844
            • 530,636

            #35
            Originally posted by Welter_Skelter
            OK It's shallow... But then so was every other HW ERA...

            The 70's had 3 Superstars.. and 20000 bums.. The 80's 2 stars and 20000 bums..The 90's 3 greats.. 20000 Bums.. Today there is One Great and 20000 bums...

            Tell me it's Shallow again..
            Horrible generalization. Maybe I 'wasn't there', but I also know that there were good contenders in those better times.

            Comment

            • kayjay
              A ***** and I'm happy
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 13652
              • 1,813
              • 5,772
              • 30,799

              #36
              Originally posted by Kaynan
              Horrible generalization. Maybe I 'wasn't there', but I also know that there were good contenders in those better times.
              You're missing the fact and seeing the myth, Kaynan.

              There were no "better times."

              Comment

              • TheGreatA
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 14143
                • 633
                • 271
                • 21,863

                #37
                The 60's and 70's HW division apart from Ali, Foreman and Frazier had fighters like Ken Norton, Larry Holmes, Jerry Quarry, Floyd Patterson, Sonny Liston, Henry Cooper, George Chuvalo, Jimmy Ellis, Earnie Shavers, Bob Foster, Jimmy Young, Joe Bugner, Ron Lyle, Oscar Bonavena, Zora Folley, Cleveland Williams, Doug Jones and Eddie Machen.

                All were good. I'm sure people could list even more.

                Comment

                • kayjay
                  A ***** and I'm happy
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 13652
                  • 1,813
                  • 5,772
                  • 30,799

                  #38
                  Originally posted by TheManchine
                  The 60's and 70's HW division apart from Ali, Foreman and Frazier had fighters like Ken Norton, Larry Holmes, Jerry Quarry, Floyd Patterson, Sonny Liston, Henry Cooper, George Chuvalo, Jimmy Ellis, Earnie Shavers, Bob Foster, Jimmy Young, Joe Bugner, Ron Lyle, Oscar Bonavena, Zora Folley, Cleveland Williams, Doug Jones and Eddie Machen.

                  All were good.
                  Some of those were good fighters, but most couldn't fight at HW today.

                  Ellis, Foster, Young were too small.

                  Cooper was crude and no better than today's Limeys, who are ****. The Ali KD is a nice legend but Clay was kidding around with his very inferior opposition.

                  Bugner and Lyle are classes below

                  Norton and Quarry are your only two legit quality heavies there.

                  Comment

                  • TheGreatA
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 14143
                    • 633
                    • 271
                    • 21,863

                    #39
                    Originally posted by kayjay
                    Some of those were good fighters, but most couldn't fight at HW today.

                    Ellis, Foster, Young were too small.

                    Cooper was crude and no better than today's Limeys, who are ****. The Ali KD is a nice legend but Clay was kidding around with his very inferior opposition.

                    Bugner and Lyle are classes below

                    Norton and Quarry are your only two legit quality heavies there.
                    Not saying they are all great heavyweights or anything like that but all were accomplished and capable boxers, certainly not bums.

                    And if Liston and Patterson aren't legit quality heavyweights in your opinion I don't know who are.

                    And the reason I listed a boxer like Foster is because he is ranked as one of the best Light Heavyweights of all time.
                    He tried to move up in that era just like Roy Jones and Michael Spinks did later, but did so unsuccessfully because he faced better, more skilled opposition.

                    What is lacking in today's HW era is skill, the boxers are bigger than they used to be in those days but boxers like RJJ and Toney can move up and fight bigger heavyweights because the heavyweights lack the kind of technique, skill or athleticism that they have (Wlad would kill both of them though).

                    In that era, if you wanted to move up, not only would you have to deal with superior size, you would also have to deal with superior skill.
                    Last edited by TheGreatA; 12-27-2007, 02:05 PM.

                    Comment

                    • kayjay
                      A ***** and I'm happy
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 13652
                      • 1,813
                      • 5,772
                      • 30,799

                      #40
                      Liston and Patterson were not quality in the 70's. You have them on the same list as Holmes? Their careers didn't even overlap. The point here is that at no one point in time were there many quality HWs, and by HWs I mean legit HWs by today's standards.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP