You know what?
If he admitted using EPO, that's one strike on him.
If EPO can only be administered intravenously, that's strike two.
You would think the suppliers would also supply an alibi in case the athlete got busted?
If he admitted using EPO, that's one strike on him.
If EPO can only be administered intravenously, that's strike two.
You would think the suppliers would also supply an alibi in case the athlete got busted?
Comment