Is Khan turning into Mayweather?? Peoples thoughts on his comments??

[Guest]

Khan's exactly like Mayweather minus the talent, chin, money and overall success.

Well, the guy is green, but I wouldn't say he doesn't have natural talent... the chin, granted. as for the final two, then the guy is a 15 fight NOVICE. What, he should be doing 850K PPVS?

[StackMo]

The comparison is groundless as noted prior.

[El Jesus]

Well, the guy is green, but I wouldn't say he doesn't have natural talent... the chin, granted. as for the final two, then the guy is a 15 fight NOVICE. What, he should be doing 850K PPVS?

the difference is that at 15 fights, mayweather was seen as somewhat of a boxing prodigy, there wasnt a single crack in his armor until the castillo fight, and to this day thats really all we have ever seen as far as him struggling, thats the biggest difference. not to mention, kahn has an entire marketing machine backing him, with mayweather, none of that came until years later around the first gatti fight, before then, only the boxing public really gave a **** about him.

[StackMo]

Correct. Warren, Inc. Welcome to the machine

[Guest]

The comparison is groundless as noted prior.

It IS, but not on the terms you mentioned.

[StackMo]

Precisely for the terms I mentioned.

[Guest]

the difference is that at 15 fights, mayweather was seen as somewhat of a boxing prodigy, there wasnt a single crack in his armor until the castillo fight, and to this day thats really all we have ever seen as far as him struggling, thats the biggest difference. not to mention, kahn has an entire marketing machine backing him, with mayweather, none of that came until years later around the first gatti fight, before then, only the boxing public really gave a **** about him.

I'm not dis*****g any of this, I was just responding to the thread in that the implication is that Khan is the new Floyd just for being a boastful smack talker, with no real comparison between skills. I'm not comparing the two for their boxing in any way, shape or form.

[Guest]

Precisely for the terms I mentioned.

The thread starter is comparing the two in terms of mouth and ego.

Not only is Khan not having the riches and fame of Floyd irrelevant to the thread topic, but it's also a completely baseless accusation. What, should we compare the riches of a one bout novice to an established star's? It goes without saying.

[El Jesus]

I'm not dis*****g any of this, I was just responding to the thread in that the implication is that Khan is the new Floyd just for being a boastful smack talker, with no real comparison between skills. I'm not comparing the two for their boxing in any way, shape or form.

The comparison between kahn and ahmed is more accurate, both of them couldnt shut up, and i saw clips of ahmed at like 9 years old running his mouth saying the same **** he was saying when he finally won a championship.

[Guest]

The comparison between kahn and ahmed is more accurate, both of them couldnt shut up, and i saw clips of ahmed at like 9 years old running his mouth saying the same **** he was saying when he finally won a championship.

I always squirm when I hear green teefs (not you, not that you're a green teef anyway) compare Khan and Hamed. It happens quite frequently on some UK forums, and other than a mouth (which isn't really the same anyway... this quote is fabricated and Khan's not THAT much of a smack talker) and a speeding conviction, then what's the only thing they both have in common? Hmmmm...