Mayweather: "Hatton Should Not Fight Again"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deliveryman
    Your token white guy
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 7592
    • 362
    • 178
    • 15,510

    #101
    Originally posted by The Weebler II
    You could have an argument on R1 in that Mayweather landed more clean shots but he was nearly felled and Hatton showed ring generalship by chasing him round the ring.

    As for the rest that differ from mine unless you're relying on compubox which acknowleges pitter patters, I couldn't give them to Floyd.

    But don't act like I'm the only one who views it this way, others have scored it similarly.
    His aggression was ineffective.

    Plain and simple.

    Comment

    • deliveryman
      Your token white guy
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 7592
      • 362
      • 178
      • 15,510

      #102
      Originally posted by Azteca
      In round 1?

      No, sir. Not from what I remember.

      And if he did, they had absolutely zero pop on them. They were just shots to score points. Not meaningful, as you so eloquentely put it.
      Well then you need your memory refreshed.

      I've watched this fight about 4 or 5 times now.

      Comment

      • deliveryman
        Your token white guy
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2006
        • 7592
        • 362
        • 178
        • 15,510

        #103
        I can't believe we're arguing over round 1.

        IMO, I thought round 6 was a hell of a lot closer than round 1.

        Comment

        • El Dominicano
          Banned
          • Aug 2007
          • 10074
          • 226
          • 49
          • 10,758

          #104
          Weebler is a ****** he ain't worth the time. He is a straight up dumb ass and he actually thinks that Mayweather won becuz of the ref. First of all the ref protected Hatton because from what I recal mayweather was winning the In-Fights

          Comment

          • Weebler I
            El Weeblerito I
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 31092
            • 1,459
            • 1,648
            • 54,550

            #105
            Originally posted by deliveryman
            I can't believe we're arguing over round 1.

            IMO, I thought round 6 was a hell of a lot closer than round 1.
            Just watched R3. How you score that to Mayweather?

            I don't know man, Hatton took more than 2 rounds. Mayweather didn't call it a war for nothing. There's two sides in every war meaning two sides sustain damage.

            Comment

            • El Dominicano
              Banned
              • Aug 2007
              • 10074
              • 226
              • 49
              • 10,758

              #106
              Originally posted by The Weebler II
              Just watched R3. How you score that to Mayweather?

              I don't know man, Hatton took more than 2 rounds. Mayweather didn't call it a war for nothing. There's two sides in every war meaning two sides sustain damage.
              Mayweather never sustained damage he just lost 2 and 5 plain and simple.

              Comment

              • Weebler I
                El Weeblerito I
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 31092
                • 1,459
                • 1,648
                • 54,550

                #107
                Originally posted by deliveryman
                His aggression was ineffective.

                Plain and simple.
                I thought he got through to Floyd a fair amount. And pressure counts regardless. Ring generalship counts.

                Comment

                • th4l3pr3ch4un
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 2250
                  • 113
                  • 111
                  • 9,076

                  #108
                  I dont really understand how one loss would be reason for retirement. I just read "Ricky was already contemplating retirement" , no he was not, hes not gonna finish his brilliant career with a ko by floyd.

                  Comment

                  • deliveryman
                    Your token white guy
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 7592
                    • 362
                    • 178
                    • 15,510

                    #109
                    Originally posted by The Weebler II
                    Just watched R3. How you score that to Mayweather?

                    I don't know man, Hatton took more than 2 rounds. Mayweather didn't call it a war for nothing. There's two sides in every war meaning two sides sustain damage.
                    Rofl, not even Billy Graham gave Ricky as many rounds as you did. Hell not even ferocity gave Ricky as many rounds as you did, which quite the feat if you ask me.

                    Comment

                    • Weebler I
                      El Weeblerito I
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 31092
                      • 1,459
                      • 1,648
                      • 54,550

                      #110
                      Originally posted by deliveryman
                      Rofl, not even Billy Graham gave Ricky as many rounds as you did. Hell not even ferocity gave Ricky as many rounds as you did, which quite the feat if you ask me.
                      How many did Billy Graham give him? and Ferocity?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP