Floyd Mayweather Jr. Versus Yesterday

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Floyd Mayweather Jr. Versus Yesterday

    By Cliff Rold - In the wake of his exciting and decisive knockout victory over World Junior Welterweight champion Ricky Hatton (43-1, 31 KO) of Manchester, England, World Welterweight champion Floyd Mayweather (39-0, 25 KO, WBC titlist) of Grand Rapids, Michigan is on top of the world. For now at least, only two real questions continue to dog him:
    How does he do against #1 Welterweight contender Miguel Cotto (31-0, 25 KO, WBA titlist)?
    How would Floyd have done against Fighter X?

    There are of course other questions that could emerge over time. Should his level of competition dramatically fall off; should he fail to face a Cotto or similarly challenging foe next year, the lengthy run of poor opponent choices fans suffered through between Jose Luis Castillo in 2002 and Zab Judah in 2006 will likely rise to be chief among them in some new form.

    Those questions must wait though. Floyd’s last four fights give fans no reason to think that, if Cotto keeps winning and selling tickets, such a fight is beyond the realm of what’s possible. If anything, Cotto’s increasing power as a draw and Floyd’s emergence in 2007 as possibly Boxing’s biggest draw make that bout all but inevitable with nothing but rhetoric and smoke to blow in the meantime. Where there’s money, there is likely to be Mayweather.

    That leaves Fighter X, the man no contemporary fighter can ever defeat no matter the when of that contemporary status. As reigning king of the welterweights, Floyd’s fighter X is often Ray Leonard or Tommy Hearns these days. When he or one of his eminently articulate hangers-on speak too boldly, it’s Ray Robinson or Henry Armstrong. They are names that carry with them the power of memory and the breath of awe.

    They are also entirely unwinnable for Floyd because they are not possible. Many of his most ardent fans get defensive when such names arise, drawing from such comparisons veiled and not-so-veiled insults. The comparisons are actually the opposite.

    Framed another way, when fans and pundits begin seriously comparing modern fighter’s chances to the absolute legends of the game it is the ultimate compliment. Mayweather-Armstrong is actually a match worth thinking about. That means Mayweather must be pretty damn good. [details]
  • AntonTheMeh
    STOP CRYIN
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 21222
    • 700
    • 709
    • 31,623

    #2
    good read.if anybody could be compared to floyd in the FUTURE is armstrong.he leaped divisions and won like floyd is doing.

    Comment

    • Sweet Pete
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2007
      • 1036
      • 41
      • 0
      • 7,385

      #3
      Originally posted by ANTONIM
      good read.if anybody could be compared to floyd in the FUTURE is armstrong.he leaped divisions and won like floyd is doing.
      Still though, his prime run and main accomplishment(3 title in 3 weight classes at the same time, should've been 4) is quite a bit more than anything Floyd has done.

      I think the guy was talking about a head to head matchup between the two. It is worth thinking about. At 130 that is some fight.

      Comment

      • AntonTheMeh
        STOP CRYIN
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 21222
        • 700
        • 709
        • 31,623

        #4
        Originally posted by Sweet Pete
        Still though, his prime run and main accomplishment(3 title in 3 weight classes at the same time, should've been 4) is quite a bit more than anything Floyd has done.

        I think the guy was talking about a head to head matchup between the two. It is worth thinking about. At 130 that is some fight.
        i know.head to head i would go with floyd though.i think at welter[armstrong one of the greatest with 18 defenses]simply on speed and size.armstrong would never give up though.

        Comment

        • crold1
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2005
          • 6354
          • 328
          • 122
          • 19,304

          #5
          AntonioM: Armstrong was better at Feather and Lightweight. Scary but true. Check his record.

          Comment

          • AntonTheMeh
            STOP CRYIN
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 21222
            • 700
            • 709
            • 31,623

            #6
            Originally posted by crold1
            AntonioM: Armstrong was better at Feather and Lightweight. Scary but true. Check his record.
            i know,but the style match up does not favor him.he is the in fighter of in fighters.floyd's pretty quick and long armed.

            Comment

            • crold1
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 6354
              • 328
              • 122
              • 19,304

              #7
              I didn't pick a winner; just saying that Armstrong's welter numners, awesome as they are, aren't really his mark. Unreal record.

              Comment

              • Sweet Pete
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 1036
                • 41
                • 0
                • 7,385

                #8
                Originally posted by ANTONIM
                i know,but the style match up does not favor him.he is the in fighter of in fighters.floyd's pretty quick and long armed.
                I wouldn't say he is an in-fighter any more than someone like Pryor is. He likes to **** up close, but what he does is swarm you.There's a difference between a swarmer and in-fighter, someone like Armstrong compared to someone like a Chavez.

                Armstrong just keeps coming forward and throwing big punches, NEVER EVER tiring or relenting(which is really amazing if you watch a whole fight with him). Floyd would have to be on his bicycle the entire fight to win, this would be the most boring, yet taxing, win of his career if he won.

                Someone like Chavez though, oddly enough, I think has a better chance of beating Floyd. I'll explain if anyone has any questions.

                Comment

                • crold1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 6354
                  • 328
                  • 122
                  • 19,304

                  #9
                  No fight with Armstrong was dull; in fact, Floyd always looks good against guys who bring it that relentless. Win or lose, we'd likely see a Floyd never seen before.

                  Comment

                  • AntonTheMeh
                    STOP CRYIN
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 21222
                    • 700
                    • 709
                    • 31,623

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Sweet Pete
                    I wouldn't say he is an in-fighter any more than someone like Pryor is. He likes to **** up close, but what he does is swarm you.There's a difference between a swarmer and in-fighter, someone like Armstrong compared to someone like a Chavez.

                    Armstrong just keeps coming forward and throwing big punches, NEVER EVER tiring or relenting(which is really amazing if you watch a whole fight with him). Floyd would have to be on his bicycle the entire fight to win, this would be the most boring, yet taxing, win of his career if he won.

                    Someone like Chavez though, oddly enough, I think has a better chance of beating Floyd. I'll explain if anyone has any questions.
                    true,but who can you compare that armstrong faced to floyd?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP