Dont Compare Williams to Hearns...I got proof!!!

[Luciano]

He's gone as far as he is going. He'll be out of the picture by this time next year.

"That's what you get for thinking"

And Sugar Ray...Margarito isn't overrated, the entire division ducked him for years...there's a reason

[Luciano]

Let's see if Paul can become a 5 divison champ with 61 wins.

Let's see if he can beat and unify everything at 147, without losing to Maywather (Leonard)...we'll start with that

[jack_the_rippuh]

Paul Williams could never throw a cross like Hearns.

[jack_the_rippuh]

Paul Williams doesn't even know how to effectively use his advantages.
He sucks at fighting tall.

[PWESTNYC]

Paul is a good fighter but he doesnt have the speed or power to compare to Tommy yet.

Watch at 1:16...MY GOD.

I hate the Hearns - Williams comparison. Their two totaly different fighters. Hearns had monster monster power and excellent speed. But his chin was a bit soft.

Williams throws bunches of punches and overwhelms and wears and opponent down. His power leaves alot to be desired so I can't see how people say he is a middleweight. He would have zero mustard on his punches at a higher weight. He just doesn't have that in his arsenal. That doesn't make him a bad fighter. Just different.

The only valid comparison is the height. **** , they dont even stand in the same stance. Williams is a southpaw and Hearns is orthodox.

[crillz]

Yeah one guy has more power and no chin...Hearns...the other is just starting to make a name for himself, has a total different style, a better one in my opinion, and is a lot busier and has better stamina

whoa whoa whoa hold up you seriously trying to say Paul Williams is better than Tommy Hearns? you must not know who Tommy Hearns is and what he's done in his lifetime, Thomas Hitman Hearns would have killed Williams if they ever fought and **** a chin yo it wont matter how good his chin is when he's KO'ed, Hearns was a TRUE beast, I can't understand this yo how someone can say williams is better than Hearns.. Williams has A LOT of flaws, he gets hit pretty easy and throws pitter patter, one day someone will walk threw his punches and clobber him pretty bad, dude is GOOD don't get me wrong but Tommy Hearns is GREAT, 2 different levels, it would be CRAZY and very foolish sounding to say Paul williams at this stage of his career is better than Tommy Hearns..

[Luciano]

Paul Williams doesn't even know how to effectively use his advantages.
He sucks at fighting tall.

Yeah that undefeated record suggests that

[AntonTheMeh]

Paul Williams doesn't even know how to effectively use his advantages.
He sucks at fighting tall.

that's what band wagon drivers DON'T GET.

[Luciano]

I hate the Hearns - Williams comparison. Their two totaly different fighters. Hearns had monster monster power and excellent speed. But his chin was a bit soft.

Williams throws bunches of punches and overwhelms and wears and opponent down. His power leaves alot to be desired so I can't see how people say he is a middleweight. He would have zero mustard on his punches at a higher weight. He just doesn't have that in his arsenal. That doesn't make him a bad fighter. Just different.

The only valid comparison is the height. **** , they dont even stand in the same stance. Williams is a southpaw and Hearns is orthodox.

Thank you...that's exactly what I'm saying, Williams is a volume puncher that doesn't sit on his punches

[Luciano]

that's what band wagon drivers DON'T GET.

Yeah he looked real bad vs Margarito