Mayweather - Hatton, the scorecards.

[Haterfree]

When you consider that Hatton only won 1 round clearly (5th) & Hatton got a point deducted & it was PBFs belt I cant trip over the scorecards because in the end it didnt matter anyway. That was 1 of the most biased commentating jobs HBO has ever done. Disappointed in Harold Lederman.

[The Noose]

I think alot of people dont know how to score a fight. But of course it isnt an exact science.

Hatttons pressure was effective in the first half of the fight because he had Floyd on the backfoot. He forced Floyd to move and evade him. It was ring generalship to an extent. Hatton was more effective early on at applying pressure than Floyd was at catching him coming in.

So i can understand Harolds scorecard, but not the judges.

And it DOES MATTER. Poor judging is terrible for boxing, KO or no KO.

[Jim Jeffries]

I had it 6 rounds to two with one even at the time of the stoppage. The only definitive round Ricky won was round 5 but I try to score fights as unbiased as I can so those other rounds could have gone either way.

That's how I had it. Ricky could have been even after 6 without the point deduction, or if Floyd had've had a point deducted for those 2 consecutive punches to the back of Ricky's head at the end of the 6th. Ricky was screwed after that and lost the 7, 8, 9 in a row and then just kept jumping straight in without sidestepping like he was earlier, till the knockout.

[The Weebler]

Official scorecard:

Cortez won 5 rounds
Ricky won 3 rounds
Floyd won the last 2

[Bobby Shaw]

At the time of the stoppage, two judges had 89-81 for Mayweather and one 82-81.

In my eyes this is a pure robbery. How can you score a boxing match in this way? I agree with Lederman's card until the 10th (I had two points for Mayweather).

What do you think?

And those 2 judges are from Nevada ,they will be judging Mayweather Marquez

[Roxas]

I agree completely with the Judges official scores.....I gave Hatton 2 rounds personally....