It's not a conspiracy theory, and I didn't bring up Mayweather. You did.
See, the problem with people who argue with me about Hatton or Mayweather. They forget that I don't give two ****s about either of them. Not on some personal level. I'm not a nuthugger of any other living (or dead, for the matter) man. I'm not here defending a fighter. I'm defending probability.
You say, you can't be "shot" in terms your ribs. Fine. So you're to assume that Hatton was the ONE guy who just KILLED IT against Castillo. No one else could really dent him, in terms of putting him down, but Hatton is JUST THAT IMPRESSIVE? That's fine.
Then remember how special you thought he was on December 8th, when because of probability, Mayweather is still officially undefeated.
See, the problem with people who argue with me about Hatton or Mayweather. They forget that I don't give two ****s about either of them. Not on some personal level. I'm not a nuthugger of any other living (or dead, for the matter) man. I'm not here defending a fighter. I'm defending probability.
You say, you can't be "shot" in terms your ribs. Fine. So you're to assume that Hatton was the ONE guy who just KILLED IT against Castillo. No one else could really dent him, in terms of putting him down, but Hatton is JUST THAT IMPRESSIVE? That's fine.
Then remember how special you thought he was on December 8th, when because of probability, Mayweather is still officially undefeated.
Comment