Better record @ 130 Sinclair or Pacquiao?

[JoartCC]

I agree,Morales was shot,Barrera the 2nd time was past his prime,i hear the first time he had outside problems,Floyds performance vs Corrales > Morales,Barrera

Excuses.

Holds no ground.

[JoartCC]

Take Juan Manuel Marquez out of there you liar, that was at feather weight (not to mention he didn't win) and so was the first Barrera fight! Cheater.

Pac Man
Marco Antonio Barrera (1)
Erik Morales (2)
Oscar Larios


PBF
Genaro Hernandez
Angel Manfredy
Diego Corrales
Carlos Hernandez
Jesus Chavez

.........................................

Hernandez win >> an old, war torn Barrera
First Morales win >> Angel Manfredy
Diego Corrales win >> 2nd win over a fading Morales
Carlos Hernandez + Jesus Chavez wins >> Oscar Larios win


Winner by U.D., Floyd Joy Mayweather.

Mere opinion which has no basis.

Full of excuses.

All in all holds no ground.

[sonofisis]

I agree,Morales was shot,Barrera the 2nd time was past his prime,i hear the first time he had outside problems,Floyds performance vs Corrales > Morales,Barrera

Morales and Barrera were definitely shot. Floyd's performance against Corrales I agree ****s on anything Pac did at 130. Mayweather's bout against Hernandez, who never lost at 130, also speaks volumes over beating an old Barrera or a Morales coming off a loss to Raheem.

[VERDUGO]

Funny how nobody was saying they were out of thier prime right before Pac faced them. Morales beats Pac in the first fight, and it was a great win for Morales. Pac comes back and beats him, and its "oh he was shot" Cmon!

Very true!
I remember even after Morales got schooled by
Raheem, nobody ever said that Morales was shot. They just said that it was just the style of raheem that morales lose or maybe the step up to 135 is too much for Morales and that he should go back down to 130 lbs.
Most of them thought that Morales beats PAC again in the rematch.
Morales got whooped, and they said he's shot. LOL
Even when Barrera lose to marquez, noone in here ever said that Barrera was too old. I wonder why? Is it because it was a fellow mexican who beat him and not PAC? bias ****s!

[Steak]

Morales was coming off of a loss to Raheem when Pacquiao beat him. Also, Pacquiao lost to him at 130 once.
Marquez and Barrera 1 werent at 130.
Barrera II was coming off a loss to Marquez, but it WAS a fairly close match, so I consider it Pacquiao's best win at 130.
Larios was coming off a loss to Vasquez and moved up 2 weight classes
I think the Solis win is pretty good. same with Valazquez

still, its pretty close. Pacquiao still has better 'names'....but Im kind of leaning toward Floyd because his opponents went on to do great things, while Pacquiaos have went on to get beat up and retire. also because Pacquiaos best wins were coming off of loses. also because Floyd had a few more fights than Pacquiao with the 130lb title, which counts a little bit.

but its still close...Ill have to think it over.

[abdiel2k3]

ima go with pacman. even tho floyd is the better fighters..
on another note, i have no ****in clue why DLH wants to fight a tinier man.. when i heard that.. i was like wow, i lost all respect for dlh was a fighter

youd think
but then realize he went up to face the monster hopkins
so it aint as krazee
hes like "**** ive done it"
Lol

[abdiel2k3]

your over lookin the key tie braker
Morales handled manford in the first fight
mayweather never lost at 130

[eazy_mas]

Erik Morales was didnt want to box from Barrera 3rd fight.

He really wasnt into boxing back then. Even the prefight interview indicated that Morales didnt want to fight and he did put his heart into the fight.