Would Floyd disappear like Naseem Hamed?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • beauty
    My name says it all.....
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2007
    • 1724
    • 98
    • 287
    • 8,276

    #21
    Originally posted by deevel79
    Why is that woman in your avatar breastfeeding a grown ass boy? He must be about 12.
    Laughing hysterically at this.


    Deevel, do some research, Sir.

    Comment

    • sonofisis
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2005
      • 3241
      • 233
      • 78
      • 9,871

      #22
      Originally posted by beauty
      Laughing hysterically at this.


      Deevel, do some research, Sir.
      Hi Beauty, good to see you.

      Comment

      • Jim Jeffries
        rugged individualist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 20740
        • 1,376
        • 2,868
        • 54,838

        #23
        Originally posted by blacksky
        Hamed did continue fighting after losing to Barrera.

        That said, i do think Floyd's world would collapse.

        Floyd has put so much pressure on himself that his Universe will collapse when he loses
        Naseem had ONE fight after Barrera, and then retired AT 28.

        Comment

        • sonofisis
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2005
          • 3241
          • 233
          • 78
          • 9,871

          #24
          Naseem retired without accomplishing anything significant, which is the ultimate difference.

          Comment

          • Jim Jeffries
            rugged individualist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 20740
            • 1,376
            • 2,868
            • 54,838

            #25
            Originally posted by sonofisis
            There are absolutely no similarities between the two.
            You're right Hamed was a much more dominating and exciting fighter.

            Comment

            • sonofisis
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2005
              • 3241
              • 233
              • 78
              • 9,871

              #26
              Originally posted by gavinz1970
              You're right Hamed was a much more dominating and exciting fighter.
              Hamed could never be more dominant than PBF seeing as how PBF accomplished more at Super-feather weight alone while beating much better opposition. Hamed's "excitement" and unorthodox nonsense is what got his ass beat into retirement.

              Comment

              • Jim Jeffries
                rugged individualist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2007
                • 20740
                • 1,376
                • 2,868
                • 54,838

                #27
                Originally posted by sonofisis
                Naseem retired without accomplishing anything significant, which is the ultimate difference.
                Yeah he only dominated the featherweight division for over 5 years, defended his WBO title successfully 15 straight times and also won the IBF and WBC belts, nothing significant there.

                Comment

                • Jim Jeffries
                  rugged individualist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 20740
                  • 1,376
                  • 2,868
                  • 54,838

                  #28
                  Originally posted by sonofisis
                  Hamed could never be more dominant than PBF seeing as how PBF accomplished more at Super-feather weight alone while beating much better opposition. Hamed's "excitement" and unorthodox nonsense is what got his ass beat into retirement.
                  Dominating as in dominating his opponents as well as his division and how did PBF accomplish more at super feather? Hamed won 3 world titles at feather.

                  Comment

                  • sonofisis
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2005
                    • 3241
                    • 233
                    • 78
                    • 9,871

                    #29
                    Originally posted by gavinz1970
                    Yeah he only dominated the featherweight division for over 5 years,
                    How do you dominate a division by defending the weakest title? Fighters indeed make the belt, but most fighters defend credible belts. If you're suggesting that Hamed's defense of his ****ty WBO title says more than Mayweather's capture of the WBC from Hernandez, and subsequent defenses over the likes of Angel Manfredy, Chavez, Carlos Hernandez, and Corrales, then you obviously must suffer from some kind of drug dependency.

                    defended his WBO title successfully 15 straight times and also won the IBF and WBC belts, nothing significant there.
                    Relatively speaking, no. He lost to the best opponent he faced and beat mostly bums.

                    Comment

                    • blacksky
                      Contender
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 473
                      • 64
                      • 15
                      • 6,564

                      #30
                      Originally posted by gavinz1970
                      Naseem had ONE fight after Barrera, and then retired AT 28.

                      and your point is?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP