espn has antonio margarito in the top 20 p4p

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jim Jeffries
    rugged individualist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 20740
    • 1,376
    • 2,868
    • 54,838

    #31
    Originally posted by passdabutter
    I AM TIRED OF PEOPLE DEGRADING MARGARITO JUST BECAUSE OF HIS 4 LOSSES OTHER THAN WILLIAMS

    marg turned pro at an early age without much amatuer experience and here is how i answer it

    3 of those 4 losses was an inexperienced margarito at the age of 17

    so does 35-2 sound a lil better?
    and also daniel santos was it super welter so that has a lil to do with it

    plz dont hate on someone without really looking into why his record is that way.
    Yeah most people don't realize that he turned pro at the age of 15. And his first two losses, he was still a kid fighting 7-1 and a 13-0 prospects. Even in the Santos loss, the fight was stopped because of a Santos headbutt when Tony was ahead on one scorecard and behind by a point on another, so if the fight had continued who knows?

    Comment

    • VIVA MEXICO!!
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 1401
      • 71
      • 6
      • 1,553

      #32
      Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
      Yeah most people don't realize that he turned pro at the age of 15. And his first two losses, he was still a kid fighting 7-1 and a 13-0 prospects. Even in the Santos loss, the fight was stopped because of a Santos headbutt when Tony was ahead on one scorecard and behind by a point on another, so if the fight had continued who knows?
      plain and basic common sense.

      Comment

      • KING •
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 3370
        • 156
        • 102
        • 4,016

        #33
        Five losses are five losses regardless of the age they occured at, what time and the hemisphere they occured in. Bad handling of his career early on has left him tarnished. Who do you blame?

        Comment

        • bsrizpac
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 6837
          • 289
          • 21
          • 7,134

          #34
          Originally posted by c'monmang'
          no one defined him as invincible..With the exception of the Santos TECHNICAL LOSS stopped early from a HEADBUTT IN PUERTO RICO. and the Williams fight//Marg's only other losses were before his 18-19 birthday cuz he turned pro when he was 15, like most mexicans do..HE DIDNT have abig time promoter guiding his career at 15, so he is gonna have some early losses. he has been ranked longer then anyother welter in the top ten by ring and has beatin more top ten welters then any other current welter..he was the #1 ranked WELTER BY RING and Floyd and shane OPENLY turn down fights with him YET..Floyd has guys like Mitchell , Ndou, Soasa and washed up Gatti..and Shane was the the WBO #1 contender for Marg and he opted for Vargas at 154 after he said he needed a couple more fights at welter before fighting Margo, yet fought guys like Cruz and Estreda.......you dont know crap about boxing...so just shut your trap
          How the **** did you turn this into Mayweather again. Jesus Christ you are most obsessed nuthugging ****gobbler I have ever seen. Kill yourself.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP