Hatton or Cotto: Who's Better?

[VIVA MEXICO!!!]

at 140 i would say hatton but welterweight its definetely cotto.

[Mozza]

His condition helped him recover, Collazo was just too damn tired to finish him.

He got his legs back. That says to me the initial trouble was more to do with fatigue than a weak chin.

[Del Coqui]

He got his legs back. That says to me the initial trouble was more to do with fatigue than a weak chin.

He got caught about 20 secs into the round. You're saying Collazo was better conditioned than Ricky? Maybe Ricky underestimated Collazo's power a bit.

[squealpiggy]

He got caught about 20 secs into the round. You're saying Collazo was better conditioned than Ricky? Maybe Ricky underestimated Collazo's power a bit.

He got caught a minute and a half into the round. He was moving forward and punching again with 45 seconds to go.

[Mozza]

He got caught about 20 secs into the round. You're saying Collazo was better conditioned than Ricky? Maybe Ricky underestimated Collazo's power a bit.

If you do any sort of endurance training you go through stages of tiredness where you feel like throwing in the towel before recovering and feeling comfortable once again. That is what I am suggesting contributed to Hatton's perceived trouble in that fight.

[AntonTheMeh]

at 140 i would say hatton but welterweight its definetely cotto.

your opinion is useless puta.

[robjr]

i dotn like either.. but cotto is better.