The most complete fighter fighting today

[-CANE-]

Hurricane asked if Mayweather can fight coming forward, the answer must be yes if he can knockdown class fighters like corrales, especially the knockdown when the he came straight out of the corner and knocked him down.

its not a non issue u are wrong and u are trying to change the subject admit it you dont know anything about Boxing ,only a fool would use the Corrales fight as an indication of Floyd coming foward and fighting offensively,if u had half a brain or knew anything about Boxing u would have said the Sharmba Mitchell fight was a indication he can fight going foward ,but if u persist that he did fight coming foward then we will have to side track what the thread is really about untill u admit he did 'nt fight offensively against Corrales

Hamed Knocked Kevin Kelly out when he was going backwards see it can be done fool

Divad - Getting back to the thread question who would be your choice? Didn't see your vote and just wandered. I personally think it's either Calzaghe or Mosley.

[Technical_Skill]

Hurricane asked if Mayweather can fight coming forward, the answer must be yes if he can knockdown class fighters like corrales, especially the knockdown when the he came straight out of the corner and knocked him down.

When the special needs bus picks you up every day to take you to special school, do you engage in basic logic.

Are you telling me a fight in which mayweather knocked corrales down 5/6 times, does not indicate he is effective going forward, especially when at least two of those knockdowns were attacking?

What are you, thick or ******?

Show me the post where i said mayweather came forward the ENTIRE fight against corrales.

[Dynamite Kid]

Divad - Getting back to the thread question who would be your choice? Didn't see your vote and just wandered. I personally think it's either Calzaghe or Mosley.

Calzaghe & Mosley ill go with

[Dynamite Kid]

When the special needs bus picks you up every day to take you to special school, do you engage in basic logic.

Are you telling me a fight in which mayweather knocked corrales down 5/6 times, does not indicate he is effective going forward, especially when at least two of those knockdowns were attacking?

What are you, thick or ******?

Show me the post where i said mayweather came forward the ENTIRE fight against corrales.

shut up fool u got owned BIG STYLE i wanna talk to sensible people no so go away little boy

[Technical_Skill]

shut up fool u got owned BIG STYLE i wanna talk to sensible people no so go away little boy

Only in your head mate, you can even answer a simple question, trying to ***** out eh?

Go on, lets see what you got,

Are you telling me a fight in which mayweather knocked corrales down 5/6 times, does not indicate he is effective going forward, especially when at least two of those knockdowns were attacking?

Show me the post where i said mayweather came forward the ENTIRE fight against corrales.

I really shouldnt be picking on disabled kids, but in the name of equality, ill give you your chance.

[-CANE-]

Oh stop crying sally, just cos you tried to say Jenson Button was on the same level as fernando alonso. (no)



I named more than one fight mayweather came forward in too, but obviously, you lot deicded to pick on corrales, a fight in which ive already addmited he spent most of it going backwards, but also showed he is effective going forwards.

And as for ****-riding 'me2007' the guy who claimed 4 weight world champ Roy Jones isnt a legend in boxing, the guys who thinks joe calzaghe has fought better fighters than Bernard Hopkins, you dont wanna be siding with him, he got the testosterone equivalent of a 12 year old girl and a ballsack the size of a peanut.

Keep your opinion.

Yeah Button is as good as the so-called great Alonso. The double world champion who is far better than Lewis Hamilton his ex rookie teammate who beat him in his rookie year, after Alsonso tried cheating and every dirty trick in the book to beat him then runs off sulking. Good ridance to the dirty ****k.

Your obviously still at school which is why the derogatory insults with anyone that disagrees with you.

[Dynamite Kid]

Only in your head mate, you can even answer a simple question, trying to ***** out eh?

Go on, lets see what you got,

Are you telling me a fight in which mayweather knocked corrales down 5/6 times, does not indicate he is effective going forward, especially when at least two of those knockdowns were attacking?

Show me the post where i said mayweather came forward the ENTIRE fight against corrales.

I really shouldnt be picking on disabled kids, but in the name of equality, ill give you your chance.

1 Show me the post where i said mayweather came forward the ENTIRE fight against corrales.

now u are trying to word it correctly cause u know i proved u to be talikng out your arse, fact is u used it as an instance of Floyd coming foward & it is false

2 Floyd Hardly ever had the centre of the ring for a start that is usally a good indication that someone is forcing a fight and leading ,nearly all Mayweather knockdowns were form him leaping in with counter's whilst Corrales was the one coming foward

like i said the Shamba Mitchell fight is when Floyd came foward and showed he can but that was'nt the issue was it u tried to say he fought that way against Corrales cause he knocked him down 5/6 times which is bull****, spending most the fight on the back foot to me is not attacking boxing no matter how many knockdowns u have ,backing your oponent up is attacking offensive Boxing like he did against Mitchelll cause it expose you more and gives u less room to punch but gives u a better opurtunity to sit dwon on your punches and Knock your oponent out

do u think theres is any difference between the way he fought Mitchell to the way he fought Corrales ,well there u go dummy

[Technical_Skill]

1 Show me the post where i said mayweather came forward the ENTIRE fight against corrales.

now u are trying to word it correctly cause u know i proved u to be talikng out your arse, fact is u used it as an instance of Floyd coming foward & it is false

2 Floyd Hardly ever had the centre of the ring for a start that is usally a good indication that someone is forcing a fight and leading ,nearly all Mayweather knockdowns were form him leaping in with counter's whilst Corrales was the one coming foward

like i said the Shamba Mitchell fight is when Floyd came foward and showed he can but that was'nt the issue was it u tried to say he fought that way against Corrales cause he knocked him down 5/6 times which is bull****, spending most the fight on the back foot to me is not attacking boxing no matter how many knockdowns u have ,backing your oponent up is attacking offensive Boxing like he did against Mitchelll cause it expose you more and gives u less room to punch but gives u a better opurtunity to sit dwon on your punches and Knock your oponent out.

do u think theres is any difference between the way he fought Mitchell to the way he fought Corrales ,well there u go dummy

Soz about the wait, lots of things going at on at work right........

What has sharmba mitchell got to do with this conversation? all i said was the corrales fight, castillo fight and Gatti fight showed that floyd can ne effective going forwards, so what if during the corrales he spent lots of it on the back foot, he wasnt on the back foot for at least 2 of those vicious knockdowns was he? which is my point and leads the fact that it showed he can be effective going forward, otherwise he would have knocked corrales down after he ran up to him at the bell and hooked him to the floor.



If the bell sounded for the round, and a fighter walked up to guy straight away, hit him with a shot and knocked him down, would you call that attacking?

[Dynamite Kid]

Soz about the wait, lots of things going at on at work right........

What has sharmba mitchell got to do with this conversation? all i said was the corrales fight, castillo fight and Gatti fight showed that floyd can ne effective going forwards, so what if during the corrales he spent lots of it on the back foot, he wasnt on the back foot for at least 2 of those vicious knockdowns was he? which is my point and leads the fact that it showed he can be effective going forward, otherwise he would have knocked corrales down after he ran up to him at the bell and hooked him to the floor.



If the bell sounded for the round, and a fighter walked up to guy straight away, hit him with a shot and knocked him down, would you call that attacking?

zzzzz boring go away you aint been busy u liar u just been feeling like a knob head ,so you 've been thinking of another way to word it my advice to u is **** OFF

[Technical_Skill]

zzzzz boring go away you aint been busy u liar u just been feeling like a knob head ,so you 've been thinking of another way to word it my advice to u is **** OFF

No i work at Sony UK, while you stack shelves. Which is why your hanging on every word i say, and have time lots of free time, and why i live in London.

Still at least you get a discount on Thrush cream for your missus and can pay your fees for Special needs school, good luck with the dribbling.