Who win against Zab was more impressive. Cotto's or Floyd's?

[ThaHorseman]

Funny how Dios (obviously) votes for Floyd, but doesnt want to explain how exactly Floyd's win was more impressive.

I'm guessing its along the lines of: Any chump can land some hard shots and KO another guy (especially after punching them in the nuts a couple times). It takes a truly better fighter to outbox somebody. So whose win was more impressive? Cotto did great coming away with a KO, but Floyd's face didn't have a scratch on it. I guess it depends on what you prefer. You're probably a Cotto fan because you like his style, so you are more impressed with his win. I'm a Floyd fan because I like his style, so I'm more impressed with his win. You probably shouldn't call people nuthuggers when your vote seems to always be for Cotto, no matter what the question.

[flipbjefrox]

Do you think they fought the same version of Zab?

Cotto fought a Zab who hadn't won a fight in two years, and had been inactive for 15 months.

Tszyu's KO of Zab was more impressive than Floyd's. But Cotto beat damaged goods.

floyd faced the version that baldomir destroyed.

[deevel79]

The only thing that impressed me with Cotto was his durability.

Ok, Once again. Cotto won 9-10 out of 11 rounds, and TKO'd Judah after giving him a brutal beatdown.

Floyd lost 4 rounds against Judah, got dropped, and went the distance with him.

How is Floyd's win more impressive?

[deevel79]

I'm guessing its along the lines of: Any chump can land some hard shots and KO another guy (especially after punching them in the nuts a couple times). It takes a truly better fighter to outbox somebody. So whose win was more impressive? Cotto did great coming away with a KO, but Floyd's face didn't have a scratch on it. I guess it depends on what you prefer. You're probably a Cotto fan because you like his style, so you are more impressed with his win. I'm a Floyd fan because I like his style, so I'm more impressed with his win. You probably shouldn't call people nuthuggers when your vote seems to always be for Cotto, no matter what the question.

Cotto won more rounds, KO'd him, and dished out more punishment. How is that less impressive than what Floyd did?

[ThaHorseman]

Cotto won more rounds, KO'd him, and dished out more punishment. How is that less impressive than what Floyd did?

When I scored the fights I had Cotto winning 7 of 10 rounds and Floyd winning 9 of 12; Since when is 7 more than 9? And Cotto also received a lot more punishment. For an example of what that does to you, see the definition of Fernando Vargas.
Do you see whats happening here? I give you my opinion and reasons and you attack it. Anyone who doesn't vote for Cotto is going to be attacked for having their own preferences.

[Undefeated]

Its funny how people say Judah was damaged goods, when EVERYONE thought Judah would beat Cotto saying that Judah is still an elite fighter and can take Cotto out.

[deevel79]

When I scored the fights I had Cotto winning 7 of 10 rounds and Floyd winning 9 of 12; Since when is 7 more than 9? And Cotto also received a lot more punishment. For an example of what that does to you, see the definition of Fernando Vargas.
Do you see whats happening here? I give you my opinion and reasons and you attack it. Anyone who doesn't vote for Cotto is going to be attacked for having their own preferences.

I'll leave you alone. When the Floyd shades are on, there is no reasoning with you. I'll let the poll numbers speak for themselves.

[ThaHorseman]

I'll leave you alone. When the Floyd shades are on, there is no reasoning with you. I'll let the poll numbers speak for themselves.

You can't accept a reasonable response, so who's the nuthugger?

[deevel79]

You can't accept a reasonable response, so who's the nuthugger?

Goodbye. U lost all credibility with me. I guess the 90% of people who voted for Cotto are blind nuthuggers. LOL. Go to bed.

[ThaHorseman]

Goodbye. U lost all credibility with me. I guess the 90% of people who voted for Cotto are blind nuthuggers. LOL. Go to bed.

LOL. If you want to know the truth, I probably would vote for Cotto. Hell, I'm a fan of both. I was just proving a point that you have an agenda. No matter what argument is presented to you, you'll always find a way to call whoever disagrees with you a nuthugger. Is it Cotto's right nut or left nut that convinces you to put up these posts? Maybe you shouldn't throw stones when you're living in a glass house.