Who win against Zab was more impressive. Cotto's or Floyd's?

[SkillspayBills]

1yr layoff vs A meltdown and loss against Baldomir...Hmmmm? A 1yr layoff shouldnt really affect a seasoned ring veteran like Judah as long as he was training and keeping busy. If that's the case, how do u view Floyd's win against Oscar, being that Oscar had a 2yr layoff prior to facing Floyd?

WRONG a one year layoff affects EVERY fighter no matter how good you are. Lol you put that in bold like Mayorga never existed. Who looked much more impressive Oscar or Judah?

[deevel79]

[QUOTE=skilspaydabills;2802226]WRONG a one year layoff affects EVERY fighter no matter how good you are. Lol you put that in bold like Mayorga never existed. Who looked much more impressive Oscar or Judah?[/QUO

My mistake. I meant to write that Oscar had only 1 fight in the 2yrs prior to the Floyd fight. Still, Oscar was extremely inactive. He wasnt even a full-time boxer when Floyd fought him. As for comparing performances, one guy can look great against 1 fighter, then look ****ty against another. You know that.

[deevel79]

Anyway, im still waiting for Dios (Floyd's hero) to stop by and explain what exactly Floyd did that was so much more impressive than what Cotto did.

[Tobi.G]

Cotto was more impressive, he was the boss in the ring and dictated the fight and stopped Judah. He made him his *****.

[ThaHorseman]

2 situations:

Situation 1: Country A bombs the **** out of country B to win a war and loses 200,000 soldiers doing it.
Situation 2: Coiuntry A strategicaly drops bombs on coutry B to limit their casualties to 50,000 while winning the war.

Which is better?

Now replace dead soldiers with lost brains cells and tell me what you think.

[El Jesus]

Cotto's win was more entertaining than impressive.

Im not voting because of this very answer, i think both fights had their way of being impressive. i thought both fights were really good and enjoyable.

[deevel79]

2 situations:

Situation 1: Country A bombs the **** out of country B to win a war and loses 200,000 soldiers doing it.
Situation 2: Coiuntry A strategicaly drops bombs on coutry B to limit their casualties to 50,000 while winning the war.

Which is better?

Now replace dead soldiers with lost brains cells and tell me what you think.

LOL. More spin tactics from you. At the end of the day, Cotto ****d Judah to the point that the ref had to basically save his live, whereas Floyd went the distance with him and lost 4rounds in the process.

[deevel79]

Im not voting because of this very answer, i think both fights had their way of being impressive. i thought both fights were really good and enjoyable.

Ok, substitute "impressive" with "decisive". Who would u vote for then?

[sonofisis]

Vote. Im curious to see the level of nuthuggery that this thread is going to bring.

Cotto fought a totally different Judah who was laid off for a year..

[El Jesus]

Ok, substitute "impressive" with "decisive". Who would u vote for then?

obviously Cotto was able to stop him, but Floyd would have likely done the same had he not been low blowed and rabbit punched, i mean the look zab had on his face told me everything.