Calzaghe is a Special Fighter!

[BKM-]

He is. Some of the shots he took without flinching, his willingness to trade with a dangerous puncher like Kessler etc. And his great boxing skills make him a great fighter period.

[Addison]

Quite simply; this is why you don't pick against Calzaghe.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Jesus. Some people take a SPORTING even to heart. It was a great fight, and the better man won. END ALL.

[Easton Assassin]

Technically superior?? How you figure. In a classical sense, maybe. But Zag has an incredible feel for the sport and is a winner.

Calzaghie is the better athlete-no doubt. but Kessler threw the textbook perfect uppercuts and straight rights-Btw Calzaghe showed a serious beard early on.

But to say calzaghie looked technically good even is a stretch. he is great at what he does, which is in and out and combination(akward) go.


Kessler lost because he has to set to throw effectively. whenever calzaghie got inside kessler was just plain clumbsy!


Kessler lost because of poor corner and inability to fight effectively close up! standard european problems.

Calzaghie is a rare breed of brawler that can box effectively-I see Hopkins beating him though- he has the right mentality to do it!

[Ramamaiden]

i dont know why is there people so unrespecful. we just saw a great fight and as boxing fans we should all be happy about it. both guys fought great, but the better boxer won. kessler is an excellent boxer, i really got a great respect for him today, but joe is just an superb boxer.
thanks both guys, cos this kind of fights are the reason i like boxing so much

[QuCongee]

Zag - Wide UD BITCHES!

Yo I ****in Told Everyone!...Cmon, what other outcome could there have been? I said it before the ink on the contract dried. Zag- Wide UD.

Money in the ****in bank *****. I Zag.

Plz plz plz plz plz slap the **** outta B-hop so I can get paid again.

[sterling]

ah c drone u not complaining after taking all them points of people haha but yeh heres ur points mofo lol gd bet. dam kessler

[Jim_Davis]

OHHHHHHHHH SHIIIiIIITTTTTT FAT YANKS AND THE DANES JUST got ****ING PWNEDDDDD!!!!!!!!

CALSLAPPY JUST OWNED ALL YOU ****** ****ERS AHAHAHAHAHAHA 20K POINTS ALL TO ME SHAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEE





how

do

you

****ing

feel?

[Azteca]

Calzaghie is the better athlete-no doubt. but Kessler threw the textbook perfect uppercuts and straight rights-Btw Calzaghe showed a serious beard early on.

But to say calzaghie looked technically good even is a stretch. he is great at what he does, which is in and out and combination(akward) go.


Kessler lost because he has to set to throw effectively. whenever calzaghie got inside kessler was just plain clumbsy!


Kessler lost because of poor corner and inability to fight effectively close up! standard european problems.

Calzaghie is a rare breed of brawler that can box effectively-I see Hopkins beating him though- he has the right mentality to do it!

harry greb was like a damn windmill. Saddler was a paul williams version of the feathers. aaron pryor was the human windmill...catch was he could box too.

All the guys above dont have great 'technique' in a classic sense, but they do have 'skills'. They can see more openings then other fighters. That's what makes them great.

Sounds like sour g****s to me, man. Sorry.

[sterling]

lol i lost points