Floyd defeated Castillo in 1st fight

[Wiley Hyena]

Jeebus. Whan an idiot.

Don't the mods have a ground to ban a poster for outright idiocy? His posts reek of ignorance and a gross lack of thoughtfulness.

I think there is a clause in the fine print about banning "imbeciles". But, "idiots" are specifically tolerated as fodder.

[warp1432]

Everybody but the judges scored that fight for Castillo, including Merchant and Lederman. Castillo won the first fight. Accept it and move on.

I see how people see that Castillo won, but there are also a lot of people who think Floyd won also (This isn't the first time people have said this). That and I don't see why people are like "ZOMG CASTILLO WON!!" and they can't admit it was a close fight. It just seems their blind hate for floyd gets in the way of actually seeing that people could see how Floyd won it.

And it's not just like cases where you don't see how the other fighter won because you don't understand the judging (For example, I don't see how Taylor beat Bernard in second one [or the first, but I think most people saw how Hopkins could have won that one] though I'll admit it was close and move on) , but in this match case people cry and scream like it was the biggest Robbery ever because Floyd was in it and won. I mean, I wonder what people would think of that match today if Floyd had a loss on his record to someone before that. Would people still complain as much?

As for Floyd vs Oscar, yeah I agree with you 115-113. Though I could have easily seen it 116-112 for Floyd. Floyd just dominated the ending rounds. Oscar ran out of gas, which kinda sucks because I wanted him to win.

[joepal]

I see how people see that Castillo won, but there are also a lot of people who think Floyd won also (This isn't the first time people have said this). That and I don't see why people are like "ZOMG CASTILLO WON!!" and they can't admit it was a close fight. It just seems their blind hate for floyd gets in the way of actually seeing that people could see how Floyd won it.

And it's not just like cases where you don't see how the other fighter won because you don't understand the judging (For example, I don't see how Taylor beat Bernard in second one [or the first, but I think most people saw how Hopkins could have won that one] though I'll admit it was close and move on) , but in this match case people cry and scream like it was the biggest Robbery ever because Floyd was in it and won. I mean, I wonder what people would think of that match today if Floyd had a loss on his record to someone before that. Would people still complain as much?

As for Floyd vs Oscar, yeah I agree with you 115-113. Though I could have easily seen it 116-112 for Floyd. Floyd just dominated the ending rounds. Oscar ran out of gas, which kinda sucks because I wanted him to win.

When you jerk-off to Floyd or Nard's pic, do you cum all over them?

[Jim Jeffries]

I see how people see that Castillo won, but there are also a lot of people who think Floyd won also (This isn't the first time people have said this). That and I don't see why people are like "ZOMG CASTILLO WON!!" and they can't admit it was a close fight. It just seems their blind hate for floyd gets in the way of actually seeing that people could see how Floyd won it.

And it's not just like cases where you don't see how the other fighter won because you don't understand the judging (For example, I don't see how Taylor beat Bernard in second one [or the first, but I think most people saw how Hopkins could have won that one] though I'll admit it was close and move on) , but in this match case people cry and scream like it was the biggest Robbery ever because Floyd was in it and won. I mean, I wonder what people would think of that match today if Floyd had a loss on his record to someone before that. Would people still complain as much?

As for Floyd vs Oscar, yeah I agree with you 115-113. Though I could have easily seen it 116-112 for Floyd. Floyd just dominated the ending rounds. Oscar ran out of gas, which kinda sucks because I wanted him to win.

My main problem with the Castillo fight is that the judges didn't even have it close, I mean 116-111, 115-111 and 115-111, what fight were they watching? Then you see the punchstat numbers where Castillo lands about 4 times as many power punches and about 40% more punches overall. Even in the rematch, which most people will say Floyd won, including me, he only won by 2, 2, and 3 points respectively. The way the fight was judged in the first fight is criminal.

[Joartcc3]

Floyd had Delahoya also beaten on Punch Stats and rounds. That still doesn't stop some idiots from thinking that Oscar was robbed.

The DLH fight was another robbery.

Your opinions doesn't count coz there is evidence to support it to the contrary.

PLAIN AND OUTRIGHT IDIOCY.

[Fox McCloud]

The DLH fight was another robbery.

Your opinions doesn't count coz there is evidence to support it to the contrary.

PLAIN AND OUTRIGHT IDIOCY.

Haha, so punchstats mean Castillo won, but punchstats don't automatically give the victory to Floyd over Oscar? Wow, what an inconsistent double-standard you have drawn up!

[Dorian]

Ok. For the ppl on this site that obviously dont pay attention.Although Ive probably said it at least 300 times(seriously) on this site.Is I respect the demeanor and style of the 85-88 Tyson. Ive never had a pic of Tyson after 88 in my sig or avatar.Nor do I really watch Tyson after 88,EVER.

So ya sorta OWNED yourself,buddy. Keep the hate to a minimal.I dont even know or talk to you online.

don't matter u still got a sick bastard in ur avatar.

[joepal]

don't matter u still got a sick bastard in ur avatar.

Hey Dorian you're looking mighty fine in that pic whaddya think of interracial?

[sonofisis]

Sorry folks........It's in the record books. Floyd is 2-0 vs Castillo

You all can ride that one close fight in Floyd's career and call it a loss if it makes you feel better.

^^In other words..

[warp1432]

My main problem with the Castillo fight is that the judges didn't even have it close, I mean 116-111, 115-111 and 115-111, what fight were they watching? Then you see the punchstat numbers where Castillo lands about 4 times as many power punches and about 40% more punches overall. Even in the rematch, which most people will say Floyd won, including me, he only won by 2, 2, and 3 points respectively. The way the fight was judged in the first fight is criminal.

Yeah the official judges scores were bad, but there have been worse (99-91 for Mora? 117-111 for Cory Spinks against Jermain Taylor???).

Though I disagree about the rematch. I had Floyd winning pretty good. Something like 117-111 or 116-112.

That and not to make excuses, but I heard floyd had a hurt hand in his first bout with Castillo. Though, no excuses because that would make me sound like the Hatton fans saying didn't do as well against Collazo because he had a cold.

When you jerk-off to Floyd or Nard's pic, do you cum all over them?

Why is it when someone is having a debate about this fight, there is always some idiot who says this ****. I mean, yes Bernard is my favorite fighter, and Floyd is my #3 favorite, but I judge bouts trying not to go in with the whole mindset he's my favorite fighter.

edit: Oh yeah, about the punch stats those can be misleading. I mean take Julio Diaz for example. He landed almost as many punches as Juan IIRC and threw a lot more, but his punches weren't nearly as effective. That's how the punchstats can be misleading. Though this fight was a lot different because it was being so close.