Boxrec: Good for boxing?

[Enayze]

That is a ridicilious question of course its good for boxing, probably the best website for boxing.

[TyrantT316]

A large database of known and unknown fighter records and stats is great.

The fact that it is a large database, one has to expect some inaccuracies and bugs. However, it is better than not having one at all AND it is up to date. The moment Floyd Mayweather decisions Hatton, it will be updated 2 minutes later.

It's very good for boxing. Inaccuracies are expected.

[xzworks]

we should have a wiki verison of boxrec or boxrec himself provides it... it much easier to provide datas with the help of boxing fans around the world..

[Pugilistic™]

it is great for fighters records. i don't use it for anything else

[Azteca]

It's good for the modern fighter. A lot of the past greats have incomplete records. But for the modern fighter it's a great source.

[TyrantT316]

It's good for the modern fighter. A lot of the past greats have incomplete records. But for the modern fighter it's a great source.

well I think also good for past fighters completed records or not...at least there is something for us to reference

I think overall boxrec is great for boxing...just being what it is, it is bound for bugs, inaccuracies and imcompletion

[Mr. Ryan]

FightFax is the bomb diggy.