Hatton's Time?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • abdiel2k3
    El Terrible
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2004
    • 6719
    • 575
    • 624
    • 24,507

    #41
    Originally posted by PRboxingfan
    To say that Hatton has proven himself (against fighters that Sharmba beat before him) and turn around and say Sharmba has not been tested is arrogant and fanatical.
    o damn
    and dat is called getting
    Skoooolllledddddddddddddddddd

    Comment

    • elveiel
      A.K.A - evil -
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2004
      • 4350
      • 218
      • 198
      • 11,006

      #42
      Originally posted by PRboxingfan
      How can you say that Sharmba is untested in 55 pro fights? I had him winning the fight against Tszyu when he had to quit because of his knee (and KZ's roughhousing). That is why I pick Sharmba to win the upcoming fight.

      Also, Mayweather's style causes problems for ANYBODY. Yes, Castillo might've arguably won the first fight against Mayweather, but that is the only arguable fight on his record (unlike, say, DLH). Hell, I'd pick Castillo, Lazcano, Corrales, and even Juan Diaz to beat Hatton, and they are one weight class below him. I think Chico would murder him, worse than anyone out there, probably, followed closely by Cotto and Kostya.

      I'm not saying Hatton is a bum, but he has been fighting bums (and Sharmba's table scraps) for ever. To say that Hatton has proven himself (against fighters that Sharmba beat before him) and turn around and say Sharmba has not been tested is arrogant and fanatical.
      It would be an idea if you learned how to use the quote button, maybe then people would know who your speaking to.

      I know i made a comment about Micthells fighting record so i'll answer the question.

      This is how you can call a 55 fight vetran untested!! after 38 pro fights he was fighting Allen Osborne, a fighter who had lost his last 10 fights and holded a record 8-15-1. Hatton faced a 36-2-2 at that stage in his career and got abuse for fighting bums.

      Mitchell has had ONE test in his career! in that first test he got a beating and retired himself. A man with 1 test and 1 loss is a failure!!

      He's still fighting chumps with terrible records now! his last opponent - http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=006260

      He's the most untested 55 fight world rated boxer ever!! He should change his nickname from little big man to little man, big *****!!

      You right, Mayweather does give anyone problems but that doesnt mean he beats anyone, which most Mayweather nuthuggers seem to think.

      Dont be so silly, to name lightweight contenders as possible Hatton victors! Do you watch boxing?? You probably picked Dorin to beat Gatti too!

      I dont thinking your speaking to me about the Hatton proving himself section in you post, you cant be because i never said that. I have never said Hatton has proved himself.

      Hatton has beaten up some Mitchell left overs, it would be hard not too, Micthell has had 55 fights and it obvious Hatton would have to fight some fighters he has already beaten.

      Someone had to beat up them fighters anyway, Mitchell couldnt so Hatton did it for him.

      Comment

      • PRboxingfan
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2004
        • 2670
        • 107
        • 59
        • 8,939

        #43
        Originally posted by elveiel
        It would be an idea if you learned how to use the quote button, maybe then people would know who your speaking to.

        I know i made a comment about Micthells fighting record so i'll answer the question.

        This is how you can call a 55 fight vetran untested!! after 38 pro fights he was fighting Allen Osborne, a fighter who had lost his last 10 fights and holded a record 8-15-1. Hatton faced a 36-2-2 at that stage in his career and got abuse for fighting bums.

        Mitchell has had ONE test in his career! in that first test he got a beating and retired himself. A man with 1 test and 1 loss is a failure!!

        He's still fighting chumps with terrible records now! his last opponent - http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=006260

        He's the most untested 55 fight world rated boxer ever!! He should change his nickname from little big man to little man, big *****!!

        You right, Mayweather does give anyone problems but that doesnt mean he beats anyone, which most Mayweather nuthuggers seem to think.

        Dont be so silly, to name lightweight contenders as possible Hatton victors! Do you watch boxing?? You probably picked Dorin to beat Gatti too!

        I dont thinking your speaking to me about the Hatton proving himself section in you post, you cant be because i never said that. I have never said Hatton has proved himself.

        Hatton has beaten up some Mitchell left overs, it would be hard not too, Micthell has had 55 fights and it obvious Hatton would have to fight some fighters he has already beaten.

        Someone had to beat up them fighters anyway, Mitchell couldnt so Hatton did it for him.
        How's this for using the quotes? Ok, now on for what I have to say.

        You call Sharmba untested, how about B-hop? He's fought three names in his carrer: lost to the first, beat the second two. Now, does that mean that before DLH he was untested because he'd only beaten one name? I think you're wrong. Tests don't merely come from fighting names and tough fighters can have bad records (look at Emmanuel Augustus).

        As for Mayweather, I think he beats almost everyone from 140 on down except for maybe KZ who has the style and experience to beat him right now (if he does well after the layoff and injury). Other than that, PBF dominates 140 until Cotto gets enough fights to challenge the style.

        How dare you call Juan Diaz, J.L. Castillo, Chico Corrales, and Juan Lazcano contenders at Lightweight? They are all champions or former champs and, in my honest opinion, they can gain the extra 5 pounds and win easily (except for Juan Diaz and Lazcano who win but not easily) against Hatton. Hell, Julio Diaz would be the best Jr. Welter right now if he weren't a super lightweight.

        And no, I din't pick Dorin.

        It's funny how you call Mayweather fans nuthuggers while you're swinging from Ricky's as I type.

        Comment

        • elveiel
          A.K.A - evil -
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2004
          • 4350
          • 218
          • 198
          • 11,006

          #44
          Originally posted by PRboxingfan
          How's this for using the quotes? Ok, now on for what I have to say.

          You call Sharmba untested, how about B-hop? He's fought three names in his carrer: lost to the first, beat the second two. Now, does that mean that before DLH he was untested because he'd only beaten one name? I think you're wrong. Tests don't merely come from fighting names and tough fighters can have bad records (look at Emmanuel Augustus).

          As for Mayweather, I think he beats almost everyone from 140 on down except for maybe KZ who has the style and experience to beat him right now (if he does well after the layoff and injury). Other than that, PBF dominates 140 until Cotto gets enough fights to challenge the style.

          How dare you call Juan Diaz, J.L. Castillo, Chico Corrales, and Juan Lazcano contenders at Lightweight? They are all champions or former champs and, in my honest opinion, they can gain the extra 5 pounds and win easily (except for Juan Diaz and Lazcano who win but not easily) against Hatton. Hell, Julio Diaz would be the best Jr. Welter right now if he weren't a super lightweight.

          And no, I din't pick Dorin.

          It's funny how you call Mayweather fans nuthuggers while you're swinging from Ricky's as I type.
          The difference between Hopkins and Mitchell opponents are that Hopkins recent opponents have been in the top 10 at the time of him fighting them. I wouldnt waste my time defending Nard anyway because i dont think he warrants his p4p number 1 rating, fighters like Mayweather have challege after challege against genuine top 5 fighters(most champs) at multiple weights. Mayweather is my p4p number 1.

          I dont agree that Tszyu(even though he's a great boxer) has a Floyd beating style, Tszyu is a flat footed box puncher and Mayweathers in and out style would cause him problems. Cotto has a Floyd beating style, his fast KO combos could counter Floyd and hurt him. I agree that Floyd could be 140 king but he's a little too small and he knows it. I wouldnt be suprised if thats a reason he's taking time off to add muscle weight. If floyd doesnt beef up i'd say he struggles against Harris, Hatton, Tszyu and Cotto. I'm not saying they would win but Floyd will have a very hard fight against them.

          How dare you!! How dare you ?? LMAO!!!

          Contender = to compete or fight. all the fighters you mention are competing to become number 1, there isnt a set number 1 in the division so the are all contending for the postition! LAUGH MY ****ING ASS OFF!!

          the differnce between a nuthugger and a someone who respects a fighter is that the nuthugger cant comprehend their fighter losing, i'm fully aware that Hatton CAN BE BEAT!! and Mayweather nuthuggers refuse to believe he can be beat!

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP